User talk:Tcheeku

=

unblock[edit]

Iam not engaged in any disruptive editing, so unblock me.

To request an unblock request, you need to follow the directions that were given to you in the block template that you deleted. It needs to be in this format: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} However, please be aware that nearly every one of your edits has been disruptive. Your edits do not follow a neutral point of view; they continually add PBUH which should not be included; you have edit warred to include these disruptive edits; you never stopped to discuss your edits despite attempts to reach out to you; and you used a sock puppet after you were blocked. If you truly want to be unblocked, you will have to show that you understand the mistakes that you made and convince an admin that you will stop editing in this fashion. If you are not able to do this, then in all likelihood, your unblock request will be declined. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 15:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me Tcheeku (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PBUH is used several times on Wikipedia read other articles u need to increase ur knowledge and u yourself using different accounts and blaming others. Tcheeku (talk) 08:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then that means PBUH should be removed several times unless the instances that you are speaking of are in direct quotes. Obviously, a neutral encyclopedia should never use its voice to wish peace upon anyone. You are welcome to present any evidence you have that I am using different accounts to admins, but I would be wildly surprised to see it as this is the only account that I have ever used. I told you how to request an unblock. Simply demanding "Unblock me" will not result in you being unblocked. If you choose to follow my advice or not, I honestly do not care, but if you want to edit Wikipedia, then you should take it to heart. Either way, I am done here. Also, I am always trying to increase my knowledge, as everyone should, but thanks for the advice anyway. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 23:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tcheeku, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 23:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]