User talk:Teambk

Ways to improve 2018 Singapore National Football League[edit]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Teambk, thanks for creating 2018 Singapore National Football League!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respond about what?

There is a message above from me, asking you to add your sources to the article you created. Boleyn (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add? The FA have limited source by the way. http://www.fas.org.sg/nfl-division-one-and-two-fixtures-updated/ Thanks, I've just added that link under the heading 'References'. Boleyn (talk) 06:51, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If Flag no need, why Young Lions with flag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.100.181.32 (talk) 02:09, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because Young Lions is a national team. not a football club. If Young Lion is the national team, then the actual national team how you address? Young Lion is not the actual National Team. Anyway, we prefer Warriors FC to have the Singapore flag — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.100.181.32 (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not actual but they are not a football club either. they are by the FA. so its reasonable enough to put the flag there. You scare people that they dont know from Singapore uh? You got see J League put Japan flag? K League put Korean flag? Why all the lame trouble.

Wikipedia meant for public from all over the world, not everyone knows which club from which country as our league involve foreign teams unlike other league. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriors Office (talk • contribs) 02:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You scare people thought you basketball team uh? You have Curry in your team? The page already is SINGAPORE premier league? Teams are suppose to be a Singapore teams unless stated. Why wanna break the rule?

You have no idea of our league system, we have foreign and local teams, whats the problem with adding the flag, it looks better overall then one with flag the other without. Rules, what rules? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriors Office (talk • contribs) 02:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Im Singaporean la. Go see Hong Kong Premier League, they also got foreign teams. they got put HK flag everywhere meh. Wiki page is not to please your eyes. its not about nice or not. Its so stupid. Im in the Singapore league page, I dont know they are from Singapore? Why dont your label Chua Chu Kang Warriors that. Maybe someone dont know where is Warriors?

There is no right or wrong, as long information is relevant to local as well as foreigner interested to know about our league. You are Singaporean and only see it on your side, I have foreign friends that have been asking about which team from where, I added the flag for easy understanding and viewing for all and not to please myself, you are agaibst it because you want to please yourself that you are right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriors Office (talk • contribs) 03:05, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thats stupidity of your friend, we are not here just to please him, not our responsibility. If he or other user is smart enough, they could have just click on Warriors FC and then know OH, its a Singapore team.

Really Guys, Stupidity who? You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warriors Office (talk • contribs) 03:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Note that if you want to move pages, please provide proper source, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you can open a move discussion to request move pages, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry, I found a source, [1], isn't it? Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is there to discuss? Its official. Stop picking on me.

Can you give some offical sources, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Saturn star (talk) 03:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saturn please help, not sure what is Warriors doing, its was fine. but he can and destroy the page. If possible, please block him.

I am not a admin so I do not have that power I suggest either going to someone who is or just stop mass reverting since that can get you both blocked for edit warring. Saturn star (talk) 04:03, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pokay, ALL 20 past season is fine, but he choose to screw things up for this year.

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teambk. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:1D1D:FF43:D9BF:524C (talk) 15:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teambk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am prevent a page being destroyed.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teambk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not done anything wrong.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Teambk, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Hhkohh (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]