User talk:TechToker

Welcome![edit]

Hi TechToker! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --WKCont (talk) 05:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinesh Maharshi has been accepted[edit]

Abhinesh Maharshi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anveshi Jain has been accepted[edit]

Anveshi Jain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Snowycats (talk) 07:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Anveshi Jain, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TechToker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was putting the information of Draft:Anveshi Jain (actress) to Anveshi Jain because the information about Anveshi Jain was incorrect. I did not intend to captivate. And my only mistake is that I did not give any reason for this and I am sorry for this. Wikipedia is my drug and I can never leave it. please unblock me.

Decline reason:

This unblock request is essentially incoherent and in any case, does not address your block evasion. Yamla (talk) 10:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla Like told that Wikipedia is like a drug to me and I can never leave it. You can understand what I want to say. TechToker (talk) 10:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not therapy. See WP:NOTTHERAPY. --Yamla (talk) 10:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I see you've been so massively abusive that you are likely considered banned by the community under WP:3X. So, yes, you will leave Wikipedia alone. In any case, we are done here. --Yamla (talk) 10:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS 36491[edit]

UTRS appeal #36491 is now closed.

At this time, the English Wikipedia unblock team is declining your unblock request and will not hear your case anymore. Your final avenue of appeal is to email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]