Jump to content

User talk:Tefalstar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the project

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

[edit]

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

[edit]

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kyriakos 11:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Wandalstouring 12:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crusades etc

[edit]

Hey Tefalstar, thanks! Yeah, this is what I do "professionally" (although I am still a student so it's not quite a profession yet). My current mission is to find all the articles about crusade historians and make sure there are plenty of links to them, and I've been trying to bring Kingdom of Jerusalem up to Featured status, although I'm not sure I'll ever have time to finish that! I'll help out with the Richard article as much as I can though. That one might be a little harder than Henry...Richard is unfortunately well-known to the general public, and I find it impossible to keep articles like that up to any academic standard (similarly, people don't know anything about the K of J, but they do know what the crusades are!). Adam Bishop 15:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

[edit]

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

FYI, re repeated refs:[1]. Do you by any chance have the page number and article title of the Daily Mail article? Tyrenius 00:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

[edit]

Click on "show" to open contents.

RIchard I

[edit]

That's okay, I'm too busy to contribute anything major these days. As for becoming an admin, I have no idea about that anymore, it's totally different from when I became one 4 years ago. I think they'll want you to have something like 2000 edits, and to have contributed to at least one featured article. It's really not that big of a deal, kind of meaningless, except for some extra buttons. Adam Bishop 01:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

[edit]

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 10:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Gerard de Ridefort

[edit]

Hi, I think that just means some Victorian writers misread it as a B. They weren't very good palaeographers, I suppose! I don't see any references to him as "Bideford" anywhere else. Adam Bishop 19:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

[edit]

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:00, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Pot vs Kettle

[edit]

The use of the term "Adelin" etc is worth using. Moreover, the article was rubbish as it stood, and if you can't see that then I suggest you reconsider your own behaviour. Michael Sanders 00:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As the article now stands it has a small paragraph on the etymology of his surname, and a rewrite of what is relevant to William - his life, his death, the relevance of his parents' marriage, etc. There isn't enough to require sections. Furthermore, given that you are a self-confessed former vandal, you'll forgive me if I doubt your judgement in the content of articles. Michael Sanders 00:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Franco-Mongol alliance

[edit]

Thanks for taking the time to read through it, I much appreciate it! Can I get you to also please post your approval at Talk:Franco-Mongol alliance#Article rewrite? That way it's easier to show consensus.  :) --Elonka 21:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Libertines

[edit]

Hi, I was intrigued by your edit here. Would you mind explaining why you undid my edit? Thanks in advance. --John (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Please see WP:V and WP:NPOV. --John (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm terribly sorry if I came across as patronising. The term 'chemistry' has a meaning in the real world and so it should always be used with great care when used as a metaphor as here, I hope you agree. The reference you introduced does not quite support the use you made of it. --John (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crusader dynasties

[edit]

Hi, yeah that Byzantine-Chinese link would be pretty cool. I've never heard of it...I know there was a lot of contact classically, but I don't know about the middle ages, especially as early as the 11th century. Anyway, for crusader dynasties I'm not sure they really have names, before the Lusignan dynasty. At first it was supposed to be an elected monarchy, Godfrey and Baldwin I had no children, and we don't even really know how Baldwin II was related to Baldwin I. Once Fulk becomes king I suppose there is some legitimacy in claiming there was a "Plantagenet" or "Angevin" dynasty, especially since this linked Jerusalem more closely to England and France, but I still don't think it is that useful of a term. I would just leave out the dynasty parameter altogether, actually. Adam Bishop (talk) 18:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)

[edit]

The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say that I found this rollback quite rude. I had given a reason for my edit, and you didn't even bother to address it in an edit comment or on the talk page. In case my point wasn't clear: Something like "X show on radio Y" (where X is a weekly show which has run for years) is not a valid source reference in the sense of Wikipedia:Verifiability, since it makes it almost impossible for other editors to verify that the claim in question was actually made: Most radio shows are not publicly available after they have been aired, and even if this one was, one would have to listen closely through hundreds of hours to find the passage which contains this information in question.

Please realize that this article has been the target of ongoing hoaxes for months. I just removed the claim that he is a homosexual, even though it was "sourced" in the same way as above, I hope you are not going to reinsert this too (see also WP:BLP).

Regards, High on a tree 17:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for digging out a better reference (but please note that it says 12 December 2007, not 5 December). I still think that encyclopedia articles are not a good place for announcing future activities (WP:CRYSTAL), but I won't spend the next ten days edit warring about this...
Regards, High on a tree 17:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)

[edit]

The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello, you have recently updated the bohemond page.. i am not sure about that.
i don't know the author of the book cited, but the sicily norman monarchy was founded by Roger I in primis, then bye Roger II.
See the List of monarchs of Sicily too.
Maybe his descents was in touch with sicily and norman kingdoms, but he didn't found them.
--Mauriziogiraldi (talk) 10:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was in error. Very sorry, excuse me.sometimes my english fail
--Mauriziogiraldi (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dore engraving

[edit]

I have no idea if it is Bohemond climbing the wall or just watching, sorry! I'll see if I can look it up somewhere. I suppose Dore himself must have had his own caption for it. Adam Bishop (talk) 06:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DNFT

[edit]

Hi Tefalstar! Thank you for cleaning up the vandalism of Talk:Pokémon. However, and you propably heard this before, you should not feed the trolls. Adding provoking comments like you did here is propably exactly the reaction they want, and it might encourage them to write more insulting messages. This IP is propably dynamic, and the person might never actually see your text. But still, I hope you understand my point. Cheers, Face 17:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Æthelwold's revolt

[edit]

Interesting article, but wouldn't it have been better to expand the article on Æthelwold (and the one on Edward the Elder) with this information? Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator selection

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Woody (talk) 10:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crusades task force

[edit]

Hi Tefalstar, I've created a Crusades task force as part of the Middle Ages WikiProject, and I thought you might be interested in helping out. Adam Bishop (talk) 10:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:49, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing templates

[edit]

Sometimes there is an "edit" link included, but I guess not here...if you need to edit the box itself, you just need to put "template:" before the name of the box. In this case, it is Template:Infobox British Royalty. If you need to add something to William's box, you just have to edit his page normally. Adam Bishop (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tripoli

[edit]

Cool, thanks, but what about page numbers for the references? Adam Bishop (talk) 01:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they bug me too. No one ever connects them like that. It's useful to have all the links in one spot, but not with that title... Adam Bishop (talk) 09:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd talk to User:Djmaschek about that, he's been working on the campaignboxes lately. Adam Bishop (talk) 03:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Tefalstar (talk) 15:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Falklands War taskforce

[edit]

OMG that is so freaky, I was literally considering broaching the same very subject with Justin today! I'm in, but you should definately contact Justin about it (LOL he's our patriarch). I can't remember seeing you around the Falklands articles though, do you have much experience with running a task force??? Ryan4314 (talk) 19:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's always rather bothered me looking at articles about ex-Falklands ships (for example) and they're really unencyclopaedic/unreferenced and I've always thought that the articles primarily concerning Argentine forces need a good copyedit regarding their use of the English language, plus it'd be nice to have uniform set of standards to use across all Falklands articles. However I'm afraid I don't know much about running a task force, but I can offer you my 100% enthusiasm. Ryan4314 (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, I have only made a fairly small number of edits to those articles and I'm not any kind of avid expert. Thanks for the offer though- I like the pun (of sorts) in the name of the group ;-) Badgerpatrol (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I didn't even notice that! 10 points for you ;) Ryan4314 (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just checked your contribs mate, you'll wanna message Narson as well, he's old school cool on the knowledge too. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Less of the old, thank you, I wasn't even born when the war occured. I just have a weird ability to absorb facts no-one ever cared about. I would take a stab at it with you guys if you wish. While Falklands isn't a speciality area for me, someone has to keep Justin out of trouble. Narson (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well u were editing the articles before me, so therefore your one of my patriarchs lol. Also you might wanna hit up Jor70 and see if he's interested, he could add to the Argentine contigent. Oh and Griffiths911 too, he doesn't do much editing but is a Falklands vet with tonnes of knowledge and pics (just check HMS Cardiff's commons page)! Ryan4314 (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There used to be quite an Irish contingent that edited the articles back in the day, but they were 'led' by VintageKits who got himself indeffed and we havn't seen them for a while. It is a pity, I fear the taskforce will look awfully partisan with the editors who currently edit those articles. Necessary is a good chap though and he seems to be onboard. No-one can say the Danish are pro-British. We blew large chunks out of copenhagen in the Napoleonic Wars and stole their entire fleet. Narson (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, until we get more people on board perhaps we should stick to Falklands articles that are less controversial, and just doing formatting edits etc. Ryan4314 (talk) 21:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at the very least conversation should perhaps occur on the pages of the more controversial things, ensure things are transparant and that people who might object or bring forward a different view have the chance. Narson (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that sounds fine, in a day or two it should be reasonably clear who and how many people are on board, then we can actually get something set up and start dabbling --Tefalstar (talk) 21:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UNINDENT

A patriarch and a trouble maker? Is this what my friends think of me? Et tu Brutus.

Seriously, I'd be very interested. Couple of names for you. Give User:Pfainuk a nudge, he recently returned after a wiki break and has a great deal of knowledge on the subject but hasn't been too active of late. Pfainuk recommends User:Sebastiankessel as an Argentine editor who can be objective and I'd respect his opinion. Justin talk 10:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So what's going on with this? Ryan4314 (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think everyone who's up for it will have replied here by now. Its just a case of seeing if any of us have experience we could use in setting it up now? --Tefalstar (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL if you set it up will Kirill "they (we) will come". Ryan4314 (talk) 15:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if I can lead the group, would someone with more experience like that role? --Tefalstar (talk) 15:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest Justin but I'm not sure if he would enjoy it (plus I can see his 3RR block being dragged up and not sure if he wants to deal with that). Pfainuk seems good. There is always user:ALR too...have we spoken to him? Narson (talk) 22:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I'd love people to have a look at my 3RR block, two editors with a chip on their shoulders, one an admin, start an edit war but the only person to get a 3RR block is the noob urging the group to take it to talk and not disrupt the article (and I didn't break the 4 revert rule). Anyway, whilst I'd be happy to help out but I doubt I'd be the best candidate to lead. Personally I'd suggest Pfainuk if he's interested or Ryan4314. Justin talk 08:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ayyubid-Crusader War

[edit]

Hi. I got your note about Template:Campaignbox Ayyubid-Crusader War. I did NOT add Sixth Crusade, etc. to this. In my opinion, Acre and Jaffa are OK and the time span ought to be 1170 (when Saladin started attacking from Egypt) to 1191 (when Richard of England sailed home). The ending date is debatable, but don't forget that Saladin was still scarfing up Crusader possessions in 1188. At any rate, I didn't create this campaignbox and I certainly didn't add the extra stuff. I did remove Crusader invasions of Egypt and put it where it belongs, in both Template: Campaignbox Zengid-Crusader War and Template: Campaignbox Fatimid-Crusader War. These are my recent creations, along with Template: Campaignbox Seljuk-Crusader War. I was inspired to organize the earlier Crusader battles when I saw Ayyubid-Crusader War. Djmaschek (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seljuk-Crusader War

[edit]

You are right that the Seljuk-Crusader War and the Zengid-Crusader War could be merged. I will admit that they are both arbitrary constructions. They were only created because many battles don't fit neatly into one of the crusades and a single war would make a rather long list. Whether I will merge them is another story, since I've already written the Zengid-Crusader war article and the other one is being written right now. Once I decided on this division into two wars, it seemed to have a certain logic. Djmaschek (talk) 03:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forbelet

[edit]

Not according to Template:Campaignbox Ayyubid-Crusader War, but Belvoir and al-Fule fit the timeframe. Adam Bishop (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we could move it...but to what? Adam Bishop (talk) 04:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe making Forbelet a redirect to that article would be best, for now. Adam Bishop (talk) 06:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Coats of Arms

[edit]

Hello, good work on the Arms for the Templar Grand Masters! Do you have the Arms for the later masters as well? That would be great, keep up the good work! --Tefalstar (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not now, but I'am drawing them. I hope to finish it during this month. You can see the progression on fr:Armorial des maîtres de l'ordre du Temple. Odejea (talk) 15:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant, keep up the great work! Where did you find the armorials if I may ask? --Tefalstar (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have put the bibliography at the end of the armorials (fr:Armorial d'Orient and fr:Armorial des maîtres de l'ordre du Temple). Mainly, I have found the description in these source (for the crusades) :

66.252.191.90

[edit]

They don't seem to be too much trouble. I wouldn't worry about it, the vandalism is easy to clean up. Adam Bishop (talk) 08:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More about Forbelet

[edit]

I noticed the discussion between you and Adam Bishop (talk) about the battle of Forbelet. If this is indeed the real name for this action, changing the name of the Battle of Belvoir Castle (1182) article would be okay with me. But please don't forget to cite your source. (This was not a mopping up action after Montgisard (1177).) I'll admit that calling it the Battle of Belvoir Castle was probably improper; I named it myself from the nearest contemporary location. (According to R C Smail, p 152, a few historians were convinced that it was a pitched battle though Smail didn't name what it would be called.) The alternative was calling it the "Crusader Campaign of 1182" but I chose not to because "Campaign" didn't seem to fit within the Battles of the Crusades category. I don't see what good purpose would be served by splitting the article in three parts, since there is little enough information as it is. In John Beeler's narrative, the campaign of 1182 is treated as a single event. (And so was the Battle of Sarmin campaign in 1115.) Djmaschek (talk) 03:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Henry V of England

[edit]

Thanks for the new information on Henry V of England. Henry's membership of "The order of the dragon" was already in "Foreign affairs", so I have moved your addition there to join it. I added a couple of extra footnotes at the same time. All the best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User talk:82.25.226.66

[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User talk:82.25.226.66|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vianello (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

[edit]

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

[edit]

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Belvoir Castle

[edit]

I don't see what purpose would be served by dividing this article into Le Forbelet and Beirut articles. The Beirut siege was really a minor incident in the 1182 campaign. Again, if you want to change the name to Le Forbelet or Campaign of 1182, do what you like. This is wikipedia after all. I would only ask that you provide your source for the name of the battle. Djmaschek (talk) 22:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there....

[edit]

Hi, I reverted your edit again to the LHC lead intro. This has been discussed at some length on the talk page, and reference number 6 already notes that there are a very small minority who are convinced the LHC will destroy the world. Unfortunately these people are not experts on the subject, however they have garnered a fair amount of media attention which is their notability for inclusion within the encyclopedia. Please visit the [[[LHC]] talk page and we can discuss your changes. Thanks and hope you weren't put out by the reversion. Regards Khukri 21:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

[edit]

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prank you

[edit]

I may have been overruled but thank you for at least giving me the satisfaction that I'm not going senile and am the only person who is mortified at this situation. I almost expected to be barred for even suggesting that Wikipedia was censored (which would be a further irony) and yet no editor appears capable of giving much in the way of a significant answer to the dilemma. --➨Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 21:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

[edit]

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

[edit]

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

[edit]

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

[edit]

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

[edit]

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:27, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)

[edit]

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:48, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)

[edit]

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

[edit]

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

[edit]

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:12, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

[edit]

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

[edit]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

[edit]

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

[edit]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

[edit]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

[edit]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

[edit]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

[edit]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

[edit]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

[edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

[edit]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

[edit]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

[edit]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members

Editorial

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

[edit]




To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:14, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:48, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 09:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 18:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

[edit]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

[edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Tefalstar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

[edit]
 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

[edit]

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

[edit]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

[edit]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

[edit]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

[edit]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]