User talk:Teiksma Buseva

This is Teiksma Buseva's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnus Klofsten (August 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only citations about him as a person are by his employer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnus Klofsten and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teiksma Buseva! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Magnus Klofsten[edit]

Please note that drafts such as Draft:Magnus Klofsten are not allowed to be filed in categories as if they were already finished articles. Drafts must stay out of categories, and the page will be added to categories only if and when the page gets accepted by an AFC reviewer and moved into mainspace as a real article. So since I and another editor have already had to come in three times to remove the page from categories that it can't be in, please note that there may be consequences — such as blocking your ability to edit the page at all anymore — if it returns to categories a fourth time while still in draft form. Bearcat (talk) 13:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read what I said above again. Keep reading it until you understand it. Bearcat (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for making mistake. I believed that Categories was cruitial part when creationg page Teiksma Buseva (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnus Klofsten (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There must be awards or similar to justify inclusion, please read WP:NACADEMIC. In addition, this is written as an essay/biography, not an article for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnus Klofsten and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]