User talk:TenaciousT

This user may have left Wikipedia. TenaciousT has not edited Wikipedia since 13 March 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello TenaciousT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Good to see you fighting vandalism, please use edit summaries more often. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 10:49, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Twokjoachim.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Twokjoachim.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joachim[edit]

I ask that you please review Wikipedia:Requested moves. You cannot simply decide by yourself that one article should be placed in one place, and another article placed at another place. These sorts of moves require discussion and the corresponding move request process. Doing a google search does not make it exactly clear who the most notable Joachim is (which may suggest we move the disambig page to the top level article Joachim). However, the google test DOES make it abundantly clear that the obscure Star Trek character does NOT belong there. Furthermore, I personally find issues with moving the original Joachim article to Saint Joachim. I urge you to undo your changes, and in the future, go through approved channels before doing controversial page moves such as this. If you have any questions about the proper process, I'd be glad to help. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c 21:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joachim (Star Trek)[edit]

An editor has nominated Joachim (Star Trek), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joachim (Star Trek) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 11:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

FYI, the original version of Joachim you posted was a copy-and-paste from Memory Alpha, which is a copyright violation under Wikipedia policy. If you're going to add future articles, please be mindful of this. --EEMeltonIV 14:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goof with image[edit]

I mis-clicked earlier and consequently got this notice on my talk page about an image, when probably it should have landed on yours. Erm. Yes. --EEMeltonIV 03:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Twokjoachim.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Twokjoachim.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:TheHauntedHoneymoon 1925.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TheHauntedHoneymoon 1925.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Haunted Honeymoon (1925), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Finlayson and George Rowe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Straight Shootin', you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Lester (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheHauntedHoneymoon 1925.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheHauntedHoneymoon 1925.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]