User talk:TforTwo214

Blocked[edit]

Sorry, but intentional vandalism such as this and this, along with your continued childishly hostile edit summaries when removing warnings make it clear you are not here to edit constructively. I have blocked this account until you can explain yourself and state that you will refrain from disruptive edits in the future. Kuru (talk) 01:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TforTwo214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just like to keep my talk page clear. I have made several positive edits and I will not vandalize again.

Decline reason:

It's one thing to want to keep your talkpage clear; it's another to be unable to communicate in the collegial, civil manner that is required on a project such as this. One or two positive edits does NOT in any way balance off the extreme vandalism you have performed. Wikipedia is not a toy or a game (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TforTwo214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So not my account is blocked indefinitely? Nobody thinks that's a little extreme?

Decline reason:

I see very few positive contributions from this account; most of it is vandalism and/or contains unnecessary incivility. You were given a second chance after your previous block, so no, it's not extreme at all. Block endorsed. Kinu ^t/_c 23:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talkpage access revoked because an administrator has identified this users talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.