User talk:ThatLawStudent

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ThatLawStudent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:00, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

As I write this you've voted in around 30 AfD discussions just within an hour, i.e around 1 every 2 minutes. Not only that, your account is also one-hour old. This is very odd behavior. Please stop this random voting in AfDs as it's just disrupting normal discussion processes, and I'd advise you to publicly declare your other accounts before it's late for you. – Ammarpad (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ammarpad Sorry I didn't vote the way you wanted, but all of my votes were well thought out and researched. I'm not going to apologize for reading text quickly in english. Why not discuss the article instead of trying to cancel my vote? ThatLawStudent (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I won't respond to your red herrings and no one ask you you to apologize. I won't repeat what I already said above either because you clearly know what you're doing, but rest assured if you continue your disruptive edit, I'll report you and you'll likely end up blocked sooner than you expect.– Ammarpad (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ammarpad well if you want to point out the "disruptive" edit maybe it was a mistake. I think I've voiced 30 thoughtful and intelligent rational opinions in the last couple hours. If you think 1 of 30 was a mistake I want to hear it. ThatLawStudent (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cheerio042, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:03, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Djm-leighpark and Bbb23 Please kindly restore access to this account and restore all AFD contributions to all 3 accounts. You will kindly note that no sockpuppetry has occurred. You will kindly note none of the accounts voted on any of the same AFD discussions. While multiple accounts by one user is not allowed, retiring accounts and starting new accounts definitely is. I stopped using one account and started another because I like contributing to AFD discussions and dont like my created articles to be prejudiced by my AFD discussions. Please do not restore access to the other 2 accounts because I will not be using them, I stop using an account and get a new one when I choose to in accordance with wikipedia guidelines. Thank You. ThatLawStudent (talk) 01:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]