User talk:TheAccountCreatorMan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheAccountCreatorMan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Don't know how my previous username violated the policy, but I'm changing it in case I decide to reverse my retirement, which is still up in the air. TheAccountCreatorMan (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Let us know if and when you so decide. --jpgordon::==( o ) 21:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheAccountCreatorMan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Don't know how my previous username violated the policy, but I'm changing it anyway. TheAccountCreatorMan (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are now blocked directly for abusing multiple accounts. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try this one last time[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheAccountCreatorMan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am deeply sorry for vandalizing Wikipedia with my hoax bridge articles back in March 2015. I am also deeply sorry for creating so many sockpuppet accounts. I created those articles mainly as a joke, before I knew Wikipedia even had policies and guidelines. When Bbb23 blocked I Love Bridges without warning, I got very upset because of Wikpedia's slogan "The Free Encyclopedia that Anyone Can Edit". I demanded an explanation, which reviewing administrator OhNoitsJamie. didn't give me. My talk page access was revoked by OhNoitsJamie just because I said that one of her comments was offensive, which is not a personal attack. I really think that Huon and Mike V has been a really big help in making me aware of what I was doing. Even though I did lie to the community for a long period of time, I have had a change of heart. I would like to edit Wikipedia (without my broken robot) constructively. I would like it if you or someone else would kindly unblock one of my accounts or the IP rangeblock that is also affecting my entire neighborhod. If you unblock an account, I would prefer it to be Wiki you now, Wiki you later! because I have the most positive contributions on that account. Again, I am deeply sorry for what I have done, and I promise to edit constructively if unblocked. TheAccountCreatorMan (talk) 00:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't buy it for a second. You have engaged in a pattern of intentional harm to the project coupled with extended periods of deceptive practices. You seem to be just saying what we want to hear, but you have never indicated with your actions that you want to actually help the project. We do forgive people who have acted abusively but we have certain expectations that have to be met first and you are not even close. HighInBC (was Chillum) 00:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your talk page access has been revoked again for wasting others' time. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]