User talk:TheCatEmpireBand

Hey! Guys! First, let me say, I'm a fan. Enjoy your stuff.

Second, this isn't allowed. Any given Wikipedia account is not allowed to be used to represent multiple people, and there's, what, six of you? So the account has to be blocked; I'm really sorry. Any or all of you - be it a band member or an employee - are welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, but it'll have to be via individual accounts. (Although you'll still have to make a note of conflict of interest.)

Again, I'm sorry for the inconvenience. DS (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheCatEmpireBand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi DragonflySixtyseven, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I am an authorized representative for The Cat Empire and Harry James Angus, as their label Operations Manager. Sometimes, when creating accounts for monitoring, correcting and keeping bands information up to date online, I create generic usernames so that the log on can be used by the person who follows me in my role one day. While I usually don't have a problem doing this, I understand why it is against Wikipedia's policy, and would like to request that this account is un-blocked and I will update the account name to by my own name so that it reflects the true nature of who is editing it. The six band members are in no way involved in my edits, although they are aware that part of my work for them includes managing online information for accuracy. Best Regards, Rhianon Damas. P.S. Thank you for being a fan!

Decline reason:

Your edits go beyond "managing online information for accuracy", they constitute a misuse of Wikipedia for promotion, marketing and/or publicity. You will not be unblocked unless you are here to contribute to the broader encyclopedia. MER-C 07:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you post your preferred username here I will change it; if it helps 'Rhianon Damas' is available. However, you have a huge conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI. Consequently, even after a name change your unblock request will be subject to close scrutiny and may well be declined. Just Chilling (talk) 03:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry James Angus (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The best qualifier of notability here is significant reception and also, notability cannot be inherited therefore the reception is what helps the chances of an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry James Angus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Harry James Angus concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Harry James Angus, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Harry James Angus[edit]

Hello, TheCatEmpireBand. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harry James Angus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]