User talk:TheIraqiAmericanYXT

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing!

Also take care of the following points:

If I left you a message; please answer on your talk page, using {{ping|Username}}, {{reply to|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in your response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to my talk page. And if you leave me a message; I will answer on my talk page, using {{ping|Username}} or {{u|Username}} in my response, or add {{talkback|Username}} or {{whisperback|Username}} to your talk page.
Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page or at the bottom of the respective section, and use a new ==Descriptive heading== for new topics.
Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ":"
Sign and date your entry by inserting four tildes "~~~~" at the end of your message.
I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
Avoid personal attacks, do not troll or use this page as a chat room.
Please, always assume good faith.
If the topic is something personal, please email me and leave {{ygm}} on my talk page.
And if you are impressed by my contributions, consider giving WikiLove.

⇒Start a new topic⇐

July 2020[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIraqiAmericanYXT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was not used abusively, I can confirm that it was I who controlled the account all along, my account wasn't compromised and you can confirm this from my Contributions TheIraqiAmericanYXT (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every edit was abusive, every single one. 100% of them. All were violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE and serve to count substantially against any possibility that you (you the person) will ever be unblocked here. Yamla (talk) 16:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIraqiAmericanYXT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I recently just read WP:CheckUser and it said that those WP:SOCK investigations require behavioral evidence, since the user Yamla is not a Check user I would prefer a Check user to evaluate my Contributions which can confirm I am not a WP:SOCK of User:سب سے بڑی گڑبڑ TheIraqiAmericanYXT (talk) 17:39, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The only thing that your contributions show is that you edit the same articles as the sock puppeteer. You're also on the same IP range. You need to post an explanation for these coincidences. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheIraqiAmericanYXT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made over 200 edits and the sock puppeteer over 1800, instead of looking at my recent edits look at the reverts Yamla did on my edits during 16:54 25 July 2020 (UTC), it will become clear that I have an interest in Arab related topics while the from the sock puppeteers talk page the sock puppeteer had an interest on India-Pakistan-Afghanistan, the sockpuppet investigation was not triggered over behavioural similiraties, remember in January 2007 a wikipedia ban on one ip banned Qatar from editing, the Arab nation had a population of 2 million and that was only one ip talk about an ip range. WP:PIXIEDUST itself says that Sock puppet investigations are to be based on behavioural evidence soley, Check User is only complementaryTheIraqiAmericanYXT (talk) 1:26 pm, 27 July 2020, Monday (20 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

All this wikilawyering doesn't change the evidence. only (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.