User talk:TheProGamer1000

👀

Speedy deletion nomination of API deletion test

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, API deletion test, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to use the page to test deletion of pages using the API. TheProGamer1000 (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Gamefam, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Also, please do not change the appearance of other editors' signatures as you apparently did at Template:Unblock/testcases. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption due to either WP:CIR issues or outright trolling. This is clearly not your first account, and I assume you've been blocked for this same type of editing previously.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheProGamer1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just testing Twinkle. I didn't know what I did was disruptive editing. I know this is not my first account as I had one that was also blocked. Unfortunately, I could imagine this ending in either a decline or a stale decline. Please unblock me.TheProGamer1000 (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Why would we even for a second considering unblocking a self-admitted block evading account? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not "testing Twinkle". And this IP edit with essentially identical content was not testing Twinkle either. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant my last few edits before I was blocked were testing Twinkle.
TheProGamer1000 (talk) 01:18, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I promise I'll never do this again :( TheProGamer1000 (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You must request unblock from your original account. Talk page access removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The explanations are trolling or lack of competence. Neither offer any assurance of you editing constructively, I'm afraid. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #68435

is closed. Wut JP sed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]