User talk:TheRealEditor101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zyc1174. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brie Bella have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Zyc1174 chat? what I did 12:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry Zyn1174. What is this, some phony crap. Look buddy. If I like Wikipedia and computers, I like Wikipedia and computers. And there ain't anything you can do about it lil bro. So get your face out of my life. I mean what are you, 22? Still living in your mother's basement of your Government advantages? Do something with your life. I mean, there are people and animals dying out there. You just ate a chicken a minute ago. Stop it. You loser. The environment is about to collapse and you think that the latest Brie Bella Wikipedia page edit is the most important thing in the universe. I mean, get a grip. Do something. Go to college. Get off your butt. Work. Your not adding anything to anyone or anything's life. I don't want to hear your name again or see it again. You're not famous and you're not important and one day I'll be suing you. If you don't like this hun, fine, ban my account. See if I care. I'm used to snoody people like you. I deal with them all the time. I've had enough. Thank you.

Your response here is absolutely unacceptable. It violates Wikipedia's policy on civility where you make numerous personal attacks toward this editor. You're expected as an editor to respond, communicate, and collaborate in a respectful and civil manner with other editors. If you disagree with the user or have issues, please feel free to discuss them directly and work toward resolving the problem - but responses like this are not okay. Please do not make uncivil responses or engage in making personal attacks toward other editors like this. Failure to communicate and maintain compliance with these policies will result in being blocked. I'm also available should you have any questions or need my input on anything - you're welcome to message me on my talk page and ask. So, please - be nice... okay? :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Mr. Weird Hair. Simplify a squared + kc squared divided by a squared = a(pi)(g)(P) + Ac squared divided by 3 DO IT!! I DON'T CARE IF I'M VIOLATING!! I'M SICK OFF THE WORLD AND I'M GOING TO PROVE EVERYBODY WHO'S EVERY DOUBTED ME WRONG!!!

May 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lil Pump. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 22:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Lil Pump shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 02:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Threat of legal action by User:TheRealEditor101. Rob3512 chat? what I did 04:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

S-s-sseriously,[edit]

if you want to share your shtick/stück w/ the world, I recommend twitter. Just sayin'.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]