User talk:TheRedBox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



This page was last edited by Ponyo (talk) 4 years ago

Rollback[edit]

Thanks for asking me, but it's something I rarely if ever get involved in, and if I did I think I'd ask people to edit 6 months first. Thanks for your help at Kappa Alpha Order, there's a problem there. Doug Weller talk 20:56, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Doug and you're welcom. Actually i found vandal edit in Kappa Alpha Order cause i always open my eyes to counter vandalism and reverted it.  TheRedBox (Talk) 21:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: i have been blocked here without a reason as i am not related with gaurav and i even don't have a friends or family name gaurav than why i get blocked as sock of gaurav? As i was just countering vandalism. It's my humble request to you to unblock me. please? i've put my lot of effort to make wikipedia clean from vandalism.  TheRedBox (Talk) 21:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Doug Weller: And i found that user have agrees that he is sockpuppet here [1] than why i am blocked cause of gaurav? This is totally unfair.  TheRedBox (Talk) 05:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to comment in this report about the accounts you've used. Abelmoschus Esculentus 14:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm blocked cause of you. Are you happy now ? Don't even know who is that gaurav  TheRedBox (Talk) 21:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanna tell you...[edit]

...that I had been once treated the same like you before -Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abelmoschus Esculentus/Archive - being "betrayed" by a user I trust. I know this is insulting, but being bold will help keep the bastards away. You need not to worry if you are innocent - since technology reveals the truth. Regards, Abelmoschus Esculentus 14:40, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that Sockpuppet investigations are only used for investigating the relationship between different accounts (with or without using the Checkuser tool), which does not imply blocks or sanctions. Abelmoschus Esculentus 14:52, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok Thankyou but this kind of things is insulting cause i am being active countering vandalism and making wikipedia clear all night.  TheRedBox (Talk) 14:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, and I apologise for that. You may continue your anti-vandalism work and we will appreciate it. I can be wrong, and I am never absolutely correct. I realised that I shouldn’t have done it, but I just want to make Wikipedia more “clear”... Abelmoschus Esculentus 15:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • But i swear to god today onwards i wont care of anyone cause all are like enemies here. And if u find me guilty u guys can block me and i even ask user mz7 to take a cvu course. you can find it on his talk page. if i am binod why would i do so? He is experienced editor as he have rights in two accounts. you can block them why you're behind me?as i haven't eaten anything of anyone i was doing my work i was learning better but you all threw water on my work. I even dont know whom to blame.  TheRedBox (Talk) 15:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not treat Wikipedia as a battleground. We are volunteers who try to improve the encyclopaedia, not warriors fighting, slaughtering or destructing all the good stuff everyday. PLEASE stop developing a negative mindset about everything here. Blocks are not used abusively like what you’ve said. Why not close the browser, take a good rest, and come back to talk again in a day or two? If you’re continuing to be like that, I afraid we cannot have any progress in the discussion. Abelmoschus Esculentus 15:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry friend. Happy editing. --Binod Basnet (talk) 16:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • as far as i know i am also volunteering here and i have not harmed anyone till now through my edits here. i have not treated wikipedia as battleground and yes i'll keep countering vandal.  TheRedBox (Talk) 18:46, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's so true. Flooded with them hundreds 11:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Binod Basnet: & @Abelmoschus Esculentus: now who is this Gaurav456 and why i'm blocked? What is this?  TheRedBox (Talk) 03:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Block[edit]

@Bbb23: i have some questions for you? Kindly answer me. (1) Who is Gaurav456? (2) why did you blocked me when i was just fighting with vandalism? (3) in this way you treat or missuse your power? Sometime you've said i redirected @Binod Basnet: and now who is this @Gaurav456: ? (4) Can you enlist any of my edit that i did violating wikipedia? All i did is i edit here for a good cause.  TheRedBox (Talk) 04:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheRedBox (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi i've been blocked cause of sockpuppet of @Gaurva456 but i'm not gaurav456. The first time i get blocked as a sockpuppet was in my first account @Iampython after that i created other accounts to edit on wikipedia cause i love to edit on wikipedia. I want to enlist those all accounts which i have used before : @Iampython @SeytX @CopX @Aviyukta @Alfajack @MAXNP @MTKASH @27.34.68.202 I created all these accounts cause i was banned as sockpuppet of @Gaurav456. If you wouldn't ban me in fake sockpuppet case than i wouldn't create other accounts and i'm amazed that others account also banned in sock of @Gaurav456. Now i've disclosed all accounts here. Do whatever you want cause i'm tired of getting blocked. I created @TheRedBox and started to fight against anti-vandalism work than again i got blocked on the sockpuppet of @Gaurav456. And other sockpuppet of Gaurav456 i don't know those accounts. Thankyou. TheRedBox (Talk) 12:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your defense against the block for violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE is that... you've violated WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE for other accounts? Thanks for admitting the block is entirely appropriate. Please consider yourself banned from Wikipedia under WP:3X. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Additional: I use Worldlink Communications as my ISP in Kathmandu, Nepal and i use to edit while visiting several places through my phone too. The one thing all i know is i don't know @Gaurav456  TheRedBox (Talk) 12:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: you all are hunters here how the block is entirely appropriate when you banned my first account in the sock of Gaurav456 or adamsmith12? You admins did fail jugdement right.  TheRedBox (Talk) 13:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. We've wasted enough time with this banned user. You were given an opportunity under WP:SO and chose to ignore it. You've admitted to rampant violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. It's best if you just adhere to your ban and leave Wikipedia alone, as you clearly can't be trusted here. --Yamla (talk) 13:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]