User talk:TheReportingReporter

August 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Islamic military jurisprudence has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Islamic military jurisprudence was changed by TheReportingReporter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96689 on 2014-08-10T05:18:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TheReportingReporter, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi TheReportingReporter! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marital rape may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Somalia]] <ref>[http://www.eassi.org/somalia "There are no laws prohibiting domestic violence, spousal rape")[</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:17, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marital rape may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Bosnia and Herzegovina]]<ref name="UNIFEM-2003" /><ref>[http://genderindex.org/country/bosnia-and-herzegovina Look under "RESTRICTED PHYSICAL INTEGRITY"- "
<ref>[http://www.eassi.org/somalia "There are no laws prohibiting domestic violence, spousal rape"][</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marital rape may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Peru]]<ref>[http://genderindex.org/country/peru#_ftn8 Look under "RESTRICTED PHYSICAL INTEGRITY".</ref><ref>[
<ref>[http://www.eassi.org/somalia "There are no laws prohibiting domestic violence, spousal rape"][</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marital rape[edit]

The source that you are citing to add countries in the section "Countries where spousal rape is not a criminal offence" is this one [1] which is based on this report: [2]. Please understand that this report only lists countries which explicitly criminalize marital rape. Where it says "no", it means that it is not explicitly criminalized (ie. that there isn't a specific "Marital Rape" law, or that the law does not explicitly make any reference to marital rape). It does not mean that the 'ordinary' rape law does not cover marital rape.

To give you only the example of Japan, according to the US Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013, [3] (see section on Women)

"The law criminalizes all forms of rape involving force against women, including spousal rape, and the government generally enforced the law effectively. The law defines rape as “a person who, through assault or intimidation, forcibly commits sexual intercourse with a female of not less than 13 years of age.” 2A02:2F0A:506F:FFFF:0:0:BC1B:459D (talk) 23:06, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed my answers on the "Questions" and "Countries where spousal rape is a criminal offence/not criminalized" sections on the talk page. To summaries what I believe we should do is:

Keep the map
Keep the list, but state a note saying "Some of the sources are not highly authentic and therefore should not always be taken into consideration. Please view the talk page for more information"
The countries with contradictory information should either be blanked out (ignored), or there should be a new section/list for it which states that the following countries are in an "doubtful" area when it comes to finding out whether it is criminalized or not.
The only countries which should be on the list are the ones which directly state whether it is criminalized or not criminalized.
There can be another section for the "countries where marital rape is not explicitly criminalized" and "countries where marital rape is not covered by the 'ordinary' rape laws" which you pointed out (or it can be together).

I hope this helped.