User talk:TheSimpsonsRCool

June 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to McMuffin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 12:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dessert, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 12:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't vandalism; I was just removing a gallery because galleries aren't allowed here. This is Wikipedia, not Wikia. TheSimpsonsRCool (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries are in fact allowed here; stop making up undocumented policies as you go. General Ization ^Talk 13:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Political views of Adolf Hitler. General Ization ^Talk 12:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. I am so sorry for the disruptive editing. I have made constructive edits before so please give me another chance. Besides I was just stating facts and trying to fix typos. TheSimpsonsRCool (talk) 10:19, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheSimpsonsRCool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I couldn't find any evidence you have made any significantly constructive edits and plenty of evidence you've been actively trying to harm Wikipedia. As such, it's very clear Wikipedia is better off leaving you blocked. Yamla (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]