Jump to content

User talk:TheSwamphen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello, TheSwamphen, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! gobonobo + c 23:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep local tags

[edit]

Please do not remove a Keep Local tag and mark a file for transfer. It is not eligible for transfer if it has that tag. Magog the Ogre (tc) 01:40, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warwick Henderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Tapsell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Frederick John William Gascoyne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schwede66 02:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66 Hi, I believe the subject to be notable and I've added a little more to the article. Can the article not just remain a stub for now? TheSwamphen (talk) 05:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Nancy Adkin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable in her own right.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ben Brown (writer)

[edit]

Hello TheSwamphen, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ben Brown (writer), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Brown (writer).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GTrang}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GTrang (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]