User talk:TheVivid

Welcome!

Hello, TheVivid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Liana Nunn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nat Gertler (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm E Wing. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Liana Nunn, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Liana Nunn. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. E Wing (talk) 20:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please quit disrupting my Liana Nunn article. I've worked hard and long on it.

Unfortunately all biographical articles in Wikipedia needs to have at least one reliable source lest it will be removed. E Wing (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And, I've edited in a few reliable sources. The article should be qualified, if not, then I'm opposed that Chris Crocker can have a wikipedia page but people like Liana Nunn can't?

Unfortunately Wikipedia links used as references are not counted and considered as such. As for Chris Crocker, have you checked the References section? You can see third-party links there, including news reports. E Wing (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize! I miss understood. I'm editing now!

Liana Nunn

Hi, I hate to hassle you, but there are still quite a few issues, especially with sourcing and citations. Please fix it up -- before it gets a nomination for deletion! Bearian (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a few?!?!?! How many issues could there possibly be? I've only accounted for 3.. And, I am no longer able to edit the page because it is "semi-protected." My account is new so I have to wait 4 days. When do you plan to nominate the page for deletion(for the 50 billionth time)?

Nomination of Liana Nunn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liana Nunn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liana Nunn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 18:39, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Just go ahead and delete it, please. Wikipedia has issues, anyways.