User talk:TheWorldo

This is TheWorldo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derekism: What is it? (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Derekism: What is it? and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mori Calliope fan talk 19:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheWorldo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mori Calliope fan talk 19:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Derekism: What is it? (September 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Derekism: What is it?[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Derekism: What is it?, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is it vandalism? It's an article about religion. And by definition a religion only needs a few followers, which it has, a set of moral beliefs, which it has, a supernatural element, which it also has. So I do not see the problem with this article. And just because it's unheard of to this point does not mean it's not factual. I mean Wikepedia was unheard of until someone created and documented it. How are people supposed to know about something if no one documents it? Please explain your logic, you can't just say it's vandalism without an explanation. TheWorldo (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]