User talk:The Anome/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 10

Proposed deletion of Fetish culture

The article Fetish culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced OR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 04:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

YomumXD

You forgot to leave a block message for User_talk:YomumXD. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I've just done so. Thanks for the reminder! -- The Anome (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move Discussion

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

15:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

15:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

15:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

15:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

16:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

User:A Traitor

You blocked this new editor for a bad username. He or she is requesting unblock, claiming that this is the username he or she uses on all sites, that it isn't meant amiss, and the intention is to edit in good faith. I can see arguments on both sides in terms of whether this should be an allowable username, so I'd appreciate your commenting (on the user's talkpage is fine). Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

I've unblocked them. -- The Anome (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Martyrs

Category:Martyrs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Diako «  Talk » 11:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

15:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

an old ghost from 2005

Hi, you look like you should be very proud of your work on Wikipedia. In 2005, we warred on some edits I had made. I just wanted to say I'm sorry, and I majored in sociology. Your screenname comes from Emile Durkheim, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smkatz (talkcontribs) 16:13, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

More bot follies

Yesterday, your bot added coordinates (from Wikidata) to Naukan people and German submarine U-666. I removed them from both articles—the former because it's about a people, not a place, and the latter because according to the article the sub disappeared mysteriously somewhere in the North Atlantic, not at a known location. I know the bot won't re-add {{coord missing}} if it's been removed from an article; is there some way to stop it from re-adding inappropriate Wikidata coordinates? Deor (talk) 10:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

It shouldn't do this, and usually won't. This was my fault: I re-scanned some articles to catch some cases that had failed to be coded because of a bug: in doing so, I made the bot ignore previous removals that had happened in the last couple of days, intending to catch any glitches by hand. Unfortunately, I missed those changes. The bot should now be back to working properly. -- The Anome (talk) 11:12, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

It’s senseless and misleading to have a single-point coordinate for a 6½-mile-long line, so I’ve removed the {{coord}}. Useddenim (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #3—2015

Did you know?

When you click on a link to an article, you now see more information:

Screenshot showing the link tool's context menu


The link tool has been re-designed:

Screenshot of the link inspector


There are separate tabs for linking to internal and external pages.

The user guide has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has created new interfaces for the link and citation tools, as well as fixing many bugs and changing some elements of the design. Some of these bugs affected users of VisualEditor on mobile devices. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.

A test of VisualEditor's effect on new editors at the English Wikipedia has just completed the first phase. During this test, half of newly registered editors had VisualEditor automatically enabled, and half did not. The main goal of the study is to learn which group was more likely to save an edit and to make productive, unreverted edits. Initial results will be posted at Meta later this month.

Recent improvements

Auto-fill features for citations are available at a few Wikipedias through the citoid service. Citoid takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. If Citoid is enabled on your wiki, then the design of the citation workflow changed during May. All citations are now created inside a single tool. Inside that tool, choose the tab you want (⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-auto⧽, ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-manual⧽, or ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-reuse⧽). The cite button is now labeled with the word "⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽" rather than a book icon, and the autofill citation dialog now has a more meaningful label, "⧼Citoid-citeFromIDDialog-lookup-button⧽", for the submit button.

The link tool has been redesigned based on feedback from Wikipedia editors and user testing. It now has two separate sections: one for links to articles and one for external links. When you select a link, its pop-up context menu shows the name of the linked page, a thumbnail image from the linked page, Wikidata's description, and/or appropriate icons for disambiguation pages, redirect pages and empty pages. Search results have been reduced to the first five pages. Several bugs were fixed, including a dark highlight that appeared over the first match in the link inspector (T98085).  

The special character inserter in VisualEditor now uses the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki can also create a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Please read the instructions for customizing the list at mediawiki.org. Also, there is now a tooltip to describing each character in the special character inserter (T70425).

Several improvements have been made to templates. When you search for a template to insert, the list of results now contains descriptions of the templates. The parameter list inside the template dialog now remains open after inserting a parameter from the list, so that users don’t need to click on "⧼visualeditor-dialog-transclusion-add-param⧽" each time they want to add another parameter (T95696). The team added a new property for TemplateData, "Example", for template parameters. This optional, translatable property will show up when there is text describing how to use that parameter (T53049).

The design of the main toolbar and several other elements have changed slightly, to be consistent with the MediaWiki theme. In the Vector skin, individual items in the menu are separated visually by pale gray bars. Buttons and menus on the toolbar can now contain both an icon and a text label, rather than just one or the other. This new design feature is being used for the cite button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled.

The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent image is linked in an article, then it is now visible in VisualEditor and can be selected, edited, replaced, or removed.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, each Wednesday at 12:00 (noon) PDT (19:00 UTC). Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q4 blocker. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the Editing team's Q4 blocker project with the bug.
  • If your Wikivoyage, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, or other community wants to have VisualEditor made available by default to contributors, then please contact James Forrester.
  • If you would like to request the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki, please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.

Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

18:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Would you be so kind to add some text and quote your source? It's a substub now.Xx236 (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I've made a start. I've also linked this article from as many of his films as I can find articles for here. -- The Anome (talk) 17:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Transracial

Hi The Anome, just double checking if you saw the discussion for you at Talk:Transracial. I'm considering adding Ethnic plastic surgery so holding back on that pending your potential undo and input. regards Widefox; talk 10:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  • No, I'm fine with my edit. If you want to revert it, that's up to you. -- The Anome (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

At least you have a sense of humor about it, unlike just about everyone else on that article. I appreciate that! Regards,--A21sauce (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for creating the Automated Certificate Management Environment stub! It looks like a nice start. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

15:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Sudden deletion of "Neutrois" redirect without discussion

See User talk:Ajfweb#Neutrois (please discuss there). Your sudden deletion without discussion of Neutrois, a redirect (not a stub), seems quite strange to me. —ajf (talk) 02:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Bot

Hi. Are you aware that these pages a bots tag to prevent The Anomebot2? Are these tags still necessary?

-- Magioladitis (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Ah. The bot wasn't obeying the robot exclusion protocol. I'll fix that tomorrow. -- The Anome (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
The Anome did you fix these? -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

"Confederate flag" redirects

Hi Anome, I was going to take Confederate flag and its title-case equivalent to RfD. Redirecting them to Modern display of the Confederate flag instead of Flags of the Confederate States of America seems like pure recentism. When I saw that they were just retargeted, I thought I'd check in with you first and hear your rationale just in case. --BDD (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I don't think you'd have much luck with an RfD. The term "Confederate flag" is in very wide use, and it's meaning is clearly the stars-and-bars thing generally associated with nostalgia for the Confederacy: see https://www.google.com/search?q=confederate+flag&tbm=nws and https://www.google.com/search?q=confederate+flag&tbm=isch&source=lnms for examples of this being the common usage throughout the media and the Web in general. I think the thing is a vile symbol of racism and oppression. But the redirect is clearly appropriate. If you do put up an RfD for this, please do me the courtesy of pinging me to let me know. -- The Anome (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't disagree that that one flag is the common name for "Confederate flag". What I think is wrong is redirecting that term to an article specifically about modern usage of the same. Look for an RfD at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 July 9 momentarily. (P.S. I don't disagree about what it represents.) --BDD (talk) 14:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Confederate flag listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Confederate flag. Since you had some involvement with the Confederate flag redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 14:39, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Washington Monument

I added a reference showing that a 1 mm geodetic precision is not meaningless. For more info see Talk:Washington Monument#Lat-lon precision. The coordinates have now been changed from NAD83(2011) to WGS84. — Joe Kress (talk) 16:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

'The Man on the Clapham Omnibus' and route 88

I have altered the wording of your edits on the London buses route 88 and 'man on the Clapham omnibus' pages to something more conservative. There doesn't seem to be any proof that route 88 or its historical equivalent was precisely what 19th-century writers/lawyers had in mind when referring to 'the Clapham omnibus'. The 1857 reference mentions the man on the knifeboard of 'the Clapham omnibus' being stuck in traffic on London Bridge. The 88 doesn't go to London Bridge, although I suppose a forerunner of today's route might have done (I can't seem to find a website that lists the details of early London bus routes). Also, on the MOTCO wiki page, it mentions a modern review of the legal phrase. A quote from this suggests that Lord Bowen (said to be the first person to have used the legal phrase in court, in the 1880s) may have had in mind a horse-drawn route from Knightsbridge to Clapham. I don't know how reliable that claim is but the modern equivalent of such a route would be the 137.

I used to live in Clapham and remember well when, in the 1990s, single-deck buses with 'the Clapham Omnibus' emblazoned on the side were introduced on route 88. I assumed at the time that it was done based on some historical research, but maybe it was just a marketing gimmick. Dubmill (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm grateful for the clarification. -- The Anome (talk) 10:28, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

03:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Your claim "the single-instruction zero-check argument does not apply" is not legitimely deriveable from "traditional FORTRAN-style loops typically count upward, not downward." How do you think FORTRAN loops and addressing schemes were compiled, and what of the resulting assembly code referred to what machine instructions? Let me assure you that a good deal of counting habits arose before FORTRAN even reached version IV, and that they arose from the heavy users of the zero-check instructions in assembly code. Certainly, HLL revealed the most of these error prone clerical details, but it was too late to remove the zero off again from counting and the history went on.
I certainly will not go searching for proof on the computer folklore, so I leave this as is, but you should know what you have deleted for what flaw in conclusion. Purgy (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I've been a reasonably old-school assembly programmer (IBM 360 / 6502 era), as well as having written microcode for bit-slice processors and, more lately, software for considerably more modern architectures, and I'm afraid I disagree with you: my recollection is that counting down to zero is not the normal idiom even in assembler for most looping-over-storage code, which is the common case for most processing loops. If you really care about saving cycles, you would loop unroll the code, eliminating the overhead almost entirely. But I can also conceive that you might be right. Given that there is a legitimate disagreement here. the burden of proof is currently on you to provide cites, as the citations given within the article do not currently provide any support for your additions. -- The Anome (talk) 12:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and by the way, here's a naive C loop, as compiled by gcc:
00000000004004bc <main>:
 4004bc:	55                   	push   %rbp
 4004bd:	48 89 e5             	mov    %rsp,%rbp
 4004c0:	48 83 ec 10          	sub    $0x10,%rsp
 4004c4:	c7 45 fc 00 00 00 00 	movl   $0x0,-0x4(%rbp)
 4004cb:	eb 09                	jmp    4004d6 <main+0x1a>
 4004cd:	e8 e4 ff ff ff       	callq  4004b6 <do_it>
 4004d2:	83 45 fc 01          	addl   $0x1,-0x4(%rbp)
 4004d6:	83 7d fc 13          	cmpl   $0x13,-0x4(%rbp)
 4004da:	7e f1                	jle    4004cd <main+0x11>
 4004dc:	c9                   	leaveq 
 4004dd:	c3                   	retq   
 4004de:	66 90                	xchg   %ax,%ax
Note the use of a comparison and branch, not a decrement-to-zero. This is a modern high-quality C compiler, and it compiles things in natural order. A similar exercise using a FORTRAN DO-loop seems to do something very similar. -- The Anome (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, cordial thanks for your open reply to my rather harsh sounding complaint, but as said, I'm not sufficiently interested in this to search for support of my remembrance. I have to admit that in the time period you refer to (systems/360), FORTRAN loops may have been compiled (by some compilers?) to upward counting instruction sequences, but the default counting direction of an index in a HLL has certainly no necessary connection to the counting direction at machine instruction level, and thus does not make your conclusion technically correct. Additionally, may I point you to the fact that no single /360 could have been sold without COBOL and FORTRAN, too, PL/I to the least, perhaps, i.e. HLLs (is this acronym still in use? High-Level-Language), and the aera of assembly programming has long been restricted to "hobbyists", seriously applied in time critical and "core" applications only (often for wrong reasons). I referred to my aera, that of 7040/7044, the early PDPs, to accumulators, to times, where a second index register already was considered a gigantic programming resource, and not to (pre-)CPUs and register stuffed architectures. Please, imagine machine instructions with only one address field! This was the time where "in-/de-crement and jump on zero/negative" had its high tide, and influenced rainmakers like E. Dijkstra to plead, absolutely counter-naturally, for starting to count at zero.
In case you have kids, best wishes to the zeroth, too. ;) Cheers. Purgy (talk) 09:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Birmingham station group

An article that you have been involved in editing—Birmingham station group —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sammich28 (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, good edit summary

Great work noting in the edit summary that you borrowed content from another wiki, for example this edit [103]. Thanks. This makes tracking copyright issues easier. Lucas559 (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome -- that was exactly the purpose of that edit comment. -- The Anome (talk) 09:49, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Copyright Violation Detection - EranBot Project

A new copy-paste detection bot is now in general use on English Wikipedia. Come check it out at the EranBot reporting page. This bot utilizes the Turnitin software (ithenticate), unlike User:CorenSearchBot that relies on a web search API from Yahoo. It checks individual edits rather than just new articles. Please take 15 seconds to visit the EranBot reporting page and check a few of the flagged concerns. Comments welcome regarding potential improvements.Lucas559 (talk) 02:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

That looks really good. We should probably use its output to compile a list of Wikipedia content-clone sites, which are likely to be the source of most of the false positives. -- The Anome (talk) 09:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #4—2015

Read this in another languageLocal subscription listSubscribe to the multilingual edition

Did you know?

You can add quotations marks before and after a title or phrase with a single click.

Select the relevant text. Find the correct quotations marks in the special character inserter tool (marked as Ω in the toolbar).

Screenshot showing the special character tool, selected text, and the special character that will be inserted


Click the button. VisualEditor will add the quotation marks on either side of the text you selected.

Screenshot showing the special character tool and the same text after the special character has been inserted


You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use VisualEditor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team have been working on mobile phone support. They have fixed many bugs and improved language support. They post weekly status reports on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving language support and functionality on mobile devices.

Wikimania

The team attended Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City. There they participated in the Hackathon and met with individuals and groups of users. They also made several presentations about VisualEditor and the future of editing.

Following Wikimania, we announced winners for the VisualEditor 2015 Translathon. Our thanks and congratulations to users Halan-tul, Renessaince, जनक राज भट्ट (Janak Bhatta), Vahe Gharakhanyan, Warrakkk, and Eduardogobi.

For interface messages (translated at translatewiki.net), we saw the initiative affecting 42 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 56.5% before the translathon, and 78.2% after (+21.7%). In particular, Sakha improved from 12.2% to 94.2%; Brazilian Portuguese went from 50.6% to 100%; Taraškievica went from 44.9% to 85.3%; Doteli went from 1.3% to 41.2%. Also, while 1.7% of the messages were outdated across all languages before the translathon, the percentage dropped to 0.8% afterwards (-0.9%).

For documentation messages (on mediawiki.org), we saw the initiative affecting 24 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 26.6% before translathon, and 46.9% after (+20.3%).  There were particularly notable achievements for three languages. Armenian improved from 1% to 99%; Swedish, from 21% to 99%, and Brazilian Portuguese, from 34% to 83%. Outdated translations across all languages were reduced from 8.4% before translathon to 4.8% afterwards (-3.6%).

We published some graphs showing the effect of the event on the Translathon page. Thank you to the translators for participating and the translatewiki.net staff for facilitating this initiative.

Recent improvements

Auto-fill features for citations can be enabled on each Wikipedia. The tool uses the citoid service to convert a URL or DOI into a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. You can see an animated GIF of the quick, simple process at mediawiki.org. So far, about a dozen Wikipedias have enabled the auto-citation tool. To enable it for your wiki, follow the instructions at mediawiki.org.

Your wiki can customize the first section of the special character inserter in VisualEditor. Please follow the instructions at mediawiki.org to put the characters you want at the top. 

In other changes, if you need to fill in a CAPTCHA and get it wrong, then you can click to get a new one to complete. VisualEditor can now display and edit Vega-based graphs. If you use the Monobook skin, VisualEditor's appearance is now more consistent with other software.  

Future changes

The team will be changing the appearance of selected links inside VisualEditor. The purpose is to make it easy to see whether your cursor is inside or outside the link. When you select a link, the link label (the words shown on the page) will be enclosed in a faint box. If you place your cursor inside the box, then your changes to the link label will be part of the link. If you place your cursor outside the box, then it will not. This will make it easy to know when new characters will be added to the link and when they will not.

On the English Wikipedia, 10% of newly created accounts are now offered both the visual and the wikitext editors. A recent controlled trial showed no significant difference in survival or productivity for new users in the short term. New users with access to VisualEditor were very slightly less likely to produce results that needed reverting. You can learn more about this by watching a video of the July 2015 Wikimedia Research Showcase. The proportion of new accounts with access to both editing environments will be gradually increased over time. Eventually all new users have the choice between the two editing environments.

Let's work together

  • Share your ideas and ask questions at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.
  • Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help.
  • If your wiki would like VisualEditor enabled on another namespace, you can file a request in Phabricator. Please include a link to a community discussion about the requested change.
  • Please file requests for language-appropriate "Bold" and "Italic" icons for the styling menu in Phabricator.
  • The design research team wants to see how real editors work. Please sign up for their research program.
  • The weekly task triage meetings continue to be open to volunteers, usually on Tuesdays at 12:00 (noon) PDT (19:00 UTC). Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration as a Q1 blocker, though. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the main VisualEditor project with the bug.

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact Elitre directly, so that she can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

14:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Ocelloid

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Process stuff

Hey, I remember that we talked last year about the WMF's process (should that be in scare quotes?  ;-) for product development, and I thought you might be interested in the notes from a Wikimania discussion that my team posted at m:Community Engagement (Product)/Wikimania 2015. It may get turned into part of a proposal for a structured method of seeking community input during the product development process, so I'd be interested in seeing whether you have anything that you'd like to add. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Barquote

Template:Barquote has been nominated for merging with Template:Quote. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wakeby distribution, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://itl.nist.gov/div898/software/dataplot/refman2/auxillar/wakpdf.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Oi! CSB: which part of {{PD-USgov}} do you not understand? -- The Anome (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

21:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Page length

Hi,

Even before I posted this, your talk page is 404,190 bytes and has 205 sections. Please archive most of it - or I can get a bot to do it if you prefer. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi: I've now put what I hope is the correct incantation for bot archiving at the top of this page. Let's see if it works... -- The Anome (talk) 23:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nodular parenchyma

The article Nodular parenchyma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite isbn/978081087489

Template:Cite isbn/978081087489 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quality improvement committee

The article Quality improvement committee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsubstantiated assertion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 12 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Thrombohemorrhagic event for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thrombohemorrhagic event is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrombohemorrhagic event until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Feudal

Hello The Anome,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Feudal for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Brian heim composer (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

18:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

User:The Anome/Airports missing coordinates

After determining the coordinates of Turnbull Field in PNG, I updated your User:The Anome/Airports missing coordinates page for that abandoned airport. In looking at other entries, I found several which have coordinates. I changed one, but then I thought I would contact you, and ask if you could update the list, and let me know when you are done. I could then look for coordinates for the ones still missing. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dthomsen8: I've now regenerated the list using Wikipedia:CatScan, which has now come back online after being out of service for some time. I haven't broken it down by country or added airport codes, though. -- The Anome (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

... is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis (see also just blocked 5aliveunlikeTW and Sixnfinal) so I suggest removing talk page access, since he has a nasty habit of going berserk on his talkpage. Thomas.W talk 18:24, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Airports without coordinates

I have made my own airports without coordinates list at User talk:Dthomsen8/Airports w/o coords with 124 entries and all the done ones deleted. Fanling Airstrip was previously done but not marked, so perhaps you should update your list.

I have been looking at every article, and improving what I can. Every airport article should say where it is or will be when constructed in the future, the references should be fixed with Reflinks or reFill tools, and the talk pages should have WikiProject templates. Hours of work with my new list have not allowed me to add even one more set of airport coordinates, which is discouraging, but I am just starting with the letter J on the list. Do you have any hints or advice on how to do it?--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

18:33, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Victoria articles missing geocoordinate data has been renamed to Category:Victoria (Australia) articles missing geocoordinate data. Example bot update from today: CB Smith Reserve --Bamyers99 (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I have adjusted the bot code accordingly. -- The Anome (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Now verified to be working as specified: see this diff.  Done -- The Anome (talk) 11:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor update

This note is only delivered to English Wikipedia subscribers of the visual editor's newsletter.

The location of the visual editor's preference has been changed from the "Beta" tab to the "Editing" section of your preferences on this wiki. The setting now says Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta. This aligns en.wiki with almost all the other WMF wikis; it doesn’t mean the visual editor is complete, or that it is no longer “in beta phase” though.

This action has not changed anything else for editors: it still honours editors’ previous choices about having it on or off; logged-out users continue to only have access to wikitext; the “Edit” tab is still after the “Edit source” one. You can learn more at the visual editor’s talk page.

We don’t expect this to cause any glitches, but in case your account no longer has the settings that you want, please accept our apologies and correct it in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences. Thank you for your attention, Elitre (WMF) -16:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

16:29, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Brave Free Men?

Long time Vancian? Rc lacovara (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes. -- The Anome (talk) 11:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Why list who is NOT affected?

Hi, you've reverted my edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartbleed to reinstate a list of vendors who are not affected. I'd like to understand your reasoning. The statement "TLS implementations other than OpenSSL are not affected" already implies these, and other, vendors are not affected. You wouldn't list, for example, all the people who are NOT running for president. 129.219.155.89 (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #5—2015

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?
You can use the visual editor on smartphones and tablets.

Screenshot showing the menu for switching from the wikitext editor to VisualEditor

Click the pencil icon to open the editor for a page. Inside that, use the gear menu in the upper right corner to "Switch to visual editing".

The editing button will remember which editing environment you used last time, and give you the same one next time. The desktop site will be switching to a system similar to this one in the coming months.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs, added new features, and made some small design changes. They post weekly status reports on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for languages like Japanese and Arabic, making it easier to edit on mobile devices, and providing rich-media tools for formulæ, charts, galleries and uploading.

Recent improvements

Educational features: The first time you use the visual editor, it now draws your attention to the Link and ⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽ tools. When you click on the tools, it explains why you should use them. (T108620) Alongside this, the welcome message for new users has been simplified to make editing more welcoming. (T112354) More in-software educational features are planned.

Links:  It is now easier to understand when you are adding text to a link and when you are typing plain text next to it. (T74108T91285) The editor now fully supports ISBN, PMID or RFC numbers. (T109498, T110347, T63558)  These "magic links" use a custom link editing tool.

Uploads:  Registered editors can now upload images and other media to Commons while editing. Click the new tab in the "Insert Images and media" tool. You will be guided through the process without having to leave your edit. At the end, the image will be inserted. This tool is limited to one file at a time, owned by the user, and licensed under Commons's standard license. For more complex situations, the tool links to more advanced upload tools. You can also drag the image into the editor. This will be available in the wikitext editor later.

Mobile:  Previously, the visual editor was available on the mobile Wikipedia site only on tablets. Now, editors can use the visual editor on any size of device. (T85630)  Edit conflicts were previously broken on the mobile website. Edit conflicts can now be resolved in both wikitext and visual editors. (T111894) Sometimes templates and similar items could not be deleted on the mobile website. Selecting them caused the on-screen keyboard to hide with some browsers. Now there is a new "Delete" button, so that these things can be removed if the keyboard hides. (T62110) You can also edit table cells in mobile now.

Rich editing tools:  You can now add and edit sheet music in the visual editor. (T112925)  There are separate tabs for advanced options, such as MIDI and Ogg audio files. (T114227 and T113354)  When editing formulæ and other blocks, errors are shown as you edit. It is also possible to edit some types of graphs; adding new ones, and support for new types, will be coming.

On the English Wikipedia, the visual editor is now automatically available to anyone who creates an account. The preference switch was moved to the normal location, under Special:Preferences.

Future changes

You will soon be able to switch from the wikitext to the visual editor after you start editing. (T49779) Previously, you could only switch from the visual editor to the wikitext editor. Bi-directional switching will make possible a single edit tab. (T102398) This project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab, similar to the system already used on the mobile website. The "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time.

Let's work together

If you can't read this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

Whatamidoing (WMF) 04:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Mass admin actions

Hello, The Anome,
I've noticed lately a number of times when an admin had to do en masse an action, like your deletion of redirects created by TX6785. I don't expect it to come up much but I was wondering how this procedure is done. As a new admin, I do most actions manually, one at a time although I do use Twinkle. Can you tell me what steps to take if, for example, you need to do a mass rollback of a sock or trolls' edits? Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

If you go to a user's contributions page, a link to the page for the mass delete option is under the "User contributions" subheading. Be careful when using it! It's easy to over-delete if you're not careful -- I just managed to do exactly that, and have spent the last ten minutes or so cleaning up by hand. Regards, -- The Anome (talk) 15:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, The Anome. It would have to be an extreme situation to need to delete all contributions on the page but I'm glad I know how to do it. Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

You've deleted a number of helpful pages. Why did you delete Category:Nazi physicians in Auschwitz concentration camp? It's even mirrored on the German Wikipedia. - TX6785 (talk) 18:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know: I've restored it. While I've tried my best to separate your useful edits to articles from the mass redirect creations, I'm not infallible. If there are any other useful pages I've deleted, please let me know. -- The Anome (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

What's up with this? You undeleted it without a rationale, so I wasn't clear what's going on; I discovered it in CAT:CSD, so I've removed the speedy template so someone doesn't unintentionally revert your undeletion. If you don't mind, instead of answering me, please just redelete it and then reundelete with a rationale. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi -- I've re-deleted it. I mistakenly recreated it after the mass-deletion of redirects mentioned in the section above, when I was going through the articles looking for accidental over-deletions. -- The Anome (talk) 17:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Redundant location coordinates

Hi Anome,
your Anomebot2 should check whether Template:Infobox settlement automatically draws coordinates from Wikidata, before adding it a second time. Can you make that possible?
THX, PanchoS (talk) 13:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

The bot should be checking for the presence of a geohack link in the rendered HTML of the page at edit time, so it should spot templates that generate this from wikidata, even if there's no coordinate template in the article text itself. If this is going wrong, I will investigate, and try to fix it. -- The Anome (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
OK, I'm not sure what's going on here; on the face of it, this should not have happened. I will have to investigate further. I wonder if this could be a page caching issue? -- The Anome (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Update: I will keep an eye on Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags to see if I can catch this happening again. -- The Anome (talk) 17:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
@PanchoS:: I've just done another Wikidata coordinate import, and so far no pages have yet appeared in Category:Pages with malformed coordinate tags. I hope the previous problems were just caused by a caching glitch. I will keep on checking to see if it recurs; if so, I can employ more heavy-weight real-time checks at the point of editing, by forcing page purges when inspecting page contents, but I don't want to do that yet because of the potential performance overhead and complexity. -- The Anome (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me ;-)
No, I think if it generally works well and this was a singular case then it's not worth the pain. Just wanted you to know, in case there was a major problem. So everything's fine! Cheers, PanchoS (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

16:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry about the other day. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 21:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm glad you're back. Regards, -- The Anome (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate that, thanks. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 18:58, 8 November 2015 (UTC)