User talk:The Original Filfi/sandbox

Hi Filfi, Thank you for alerting me to your note on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_law_clerks_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States#List_converted_into_one_gigantic_sortable_table . I appreciate the work you have done, but I'm not sure that going back to 9 tables is the right answer. So far, no one has objected to the loading time or size of the big table. Has it been a problem for you? And I worry that, as before, people will find it difficult to edit the transcluded pages and will be frustrated that they can't sort across the nine seats (as they expressed in previous years in the Talk page). I'm particularly worried that you have removed the Justice number which allows sorting chronologically by justice and put multiple justices on one line for clerks who worked for more than one justice. This makes it difficult to do a complete sort even within one seat. --Randy