User talk:The Wookieepedian

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ewoks battle for endor STV81281.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ewoks battle for endor STV81281.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Itchy-HS.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Itchy-HS.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Kashyyykplanet.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kashyyykplanet.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Eu2 bg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eu2 bg.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Movie bg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Movie bg.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skull talk page

Sorry about that, but if you're reacting to that... I do agree, yes, some editors seem unable to read at times. Alientraveller (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account, because after a review of some of your contributions it appears that we can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: and believe you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Rollback feature and Rollback school. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Cheers, NoSeptember 19:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Firefly (soundtrack)

I have nominated Firefly (soundtrack), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefly (soundtrack). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Guy (Help!) 07:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malla-HS.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Malla-HS.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving Star Wars to Featured Article status

I am currently working on improving Star Wars to Featured Article status, and I noticed that you have made a substantial amount of contributions recently. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could help out and improve the article. Right now, the primary thing that needs to be done is the addition of more references – the article simply is not referenced enough. I have added {{fact}} tags on the page, which shows up as [citation needed] to make it easier to find what information needs references. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 04:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Charal1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Charal1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Indiana Jones

I'm writing up an article for minor Indy characters here, could you write up the section on his mum and maybe other major characters in the TV show? I reckon it would be unencyclopedic to cite the feature length re-edits of the show, because I understand important information was left out when they cut the old Indiana scenes. Alientraveller (talk) 15:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I learn something new each day! Could you fix the cite (no. 42) though? Alientraveller (talk) 19:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'll be pleased to hear IGN did some character analysis of the TV show, which I implemented into the character's article: disillusionment in WW1 making him go from "it belongs in a museum" to "fortune and glory". Alientraveller (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Star Wars live-action television series

I have nominated Category:Star Wars live-action television series (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MTV may have gotten there first, but darn it if you aren't getting some more belated medals!

		The WikiProject Films Award
		I, Girolamo Savonarola (talk), hereby award The Wookieepedian the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to WikiProject Films. Awarded retrospectively for being instrumental in making an article of the WikiProject Films core list (Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope) into a featured article. Awarded 03:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The article on Soldier (film)

An IP editor has removed some material you placed, two years ago, in the article, Soldier (film), based on lack of source. I did some searching and, of course, found your Wookieepedia page mentioning the removal of the Tannhauser Gate battle scene from the film. I've been unable to find reliable source for this, anything more than blog mentions or the like. If the scene was in the script, and if the original script is available somewhere, this may suffice. Anyway, I thought you might like to look at Soldier (film) and at Talk:Soldier (film). At this point, I'd be pushing WP:3RR to keep the material in.

The scene at the end of Blade Runner where the Tannhauser Gate is mentioned is one of my favorite movies scenes of all time. And I'm over three times your age.... --Abd (talk) 23:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THX 1138 re-write

Hey, what's up? I was thinking about re-writing (or expanding and sourcing) THX 1138 to try to get it up to GA status. I noticed it on your "Goals for improvement" list and thought that you might want to help. If you do, let me know on my talk page and we can get started; if not, it's not a big deal. Thanks! Black ngold29 06:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rotstarfful-bigstickerbook.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rotstarfful-bigstickerbook.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Rotstarfful-bigstickerbook.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rotstarfful-bigstickerbook.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. β^_command 17:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Leonov (fictional spacecraft)

I have nominated Leonov (fictional spacecraft), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonov (fictional spacecraft). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Clarityfiend (talk) 03:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Firefly front cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Firefly front cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:33, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hasbrocopy.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Hasbrocopy.jpeg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lifedayimage.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lifedayimage.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones WikiProject Now Open!

I have finally created a WikiProject for Indiana Jones! Check it out. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 21:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at my contributions to the discussion pages for List_of_The_Young_Indiana_Jones_Chronicles_episodes and The_Young_Indiana_Jones_Chronicles. I need some feedback. Athinsz (talk) 19:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lukepromo2321.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lukepromo2321.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:WillowDVDcover.jpeg)

You've uploaded File:WillowDVDcover.jpeg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no see

How have you been? — Deckill er 01:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Blue Sun

An article that you have been involved in editing, Blue Sun, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Sun. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Robofish (talk) 02:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tannhauser Gate

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tannhauser Gate. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tannhauser Gate. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fettcartoon.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Fettcartoon.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research

The Wookieepedian,

Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.

This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.

Take the survey

Thank you!

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.

CMUResearcher (talk) 19:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chronology of Star Wars

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chronology of Star Wars. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronology of Star Wars (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Caravan bg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Caravan bg.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Replicant character

Template:Replicant character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:EwoksLost.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EwoksLost.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ringwitchcrystal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ringwitchcrystal.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Van Ling

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Van Ling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 01:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MLB40392 500.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MLB40392 500.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Newjediorder1024.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Newjediorder1024.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 11:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Han 125x110 animated.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Han 125x110 animated.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Be Lazy

Please don't be a lazy Wikipedia:Copy-paste guy and violate Wikipedia:Copyrights rules. Take the time to write your own copy. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Band and Blonde on Blonde

Hi, Wookieepedian! I noticed you added Blonde on Blonde to the Dylan-Band collaborations in The Band's article. This could be mis-leading, and I wasn't sure how to handle the clarification, other than possibly with a footnote. As you probably know, only one song on the album, "One of Us Must Know", involved members of The Band, but just Danko and Robertson. Once the sessions moved to Nashville, Robertson was the only Band member to continue in the recordings. Any suggestions? My inclination is to remove it, given that one or two band members doth not a full Band make. Allreet (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. Out of curiosity, I looked it up. Robertson appeared on all BoB tracks except "Sad-Eyed Lady" and "Stuck Inside of Mobile". And Kooper played on all of them except for Robertson's one other tune, "One of Us Must Know", which was Danko's only contribution. The source is Olof Bjorner (one of many of his links). I'm fairly certain other Dylan editors would reject this as a Band collaboration, so if you don't mind, I'll remove the reference. Allreet (talk) 05:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: Al Kooper also played organ on "One of Us Must Know". Allreet (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article restructuring at the Beatles

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 02:50, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Current/Past Members of the Beatles

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 00:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP Star Wars in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Star Wars for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:58, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see you in hell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.19.45.55 (talk) 08:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. When you recently edited True Confessions Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Band/Clapton

Members of the Band collaborated with Clapton on No Reason to Cry, not the Band itself. As for The Last Waltz, Jubilation and their Hall of Fame induction, I don't believe those constitute collaborations. Accompaniment and collaboration are not the same thing. - tSR – Nth Man (talk) 16:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Red Tails

Regarding Film Comment at Red Tails, if you endorse the use of that reference, then that is fine. I came across a few accounts that were basically only referencing Film Comment, like if a new issue comes out, they'll put the online articles in as many film articles as possible. These should not be included that way since it is a conflict of interest and solicitation to boot. Editors independent of this pattern can include and/or restore references to this periodical. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:59, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Traveling Wilburys list of band members

Hi The Wookieepedian. I notice you've contributed quite a bit to the Traveling Wilburys band article recently. I've started a discussion on the talk page about which order the band members should be listed in – I'm sure it's an issue that has been raised in the past, but I'd welcome your input if you have time. Many thanks, JG66 (talk) 11:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Levon Helm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Right Stuff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jefferson Airplane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Firefly (TV series) fan films

As you created the original Category:Firefly fan films, please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 March 13#Category:Firefly (TV series) fan films. – Fayenatic London 15:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimeetup Kentucky? Join us at THATCamp KY, June 1-2, 2013

Wikimeetup Kentucky – We need you!

Hi The Wookieepedian! I'm helping to organize THATCamp Kentucky – June 1 & 2 at the University of Kentucky in Lexington. Take a look at the Tentative Schedule. Let's get together in person to work on Kentucky-related wikipedia pages, what do you say? If you have any questions, please email the THATCamp KY Organizer, Lee Skallerup Bessette (Morehead State University, @readywriting) at thatcampky@gmail.com. Please sign up to participate Wikimeetup Kentucky. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! Randolph.hollingsworth (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TOSopeninglogo.png

You uploaded the JPG version that was superceded by the PNG version, uploaded by someone else, who is inactive since last month. There is this one: It is free to use without problems, so I guess the non-free image may fail to be "irreplaceable". --George Ho (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars Holiday Special

You added back "The", violating the latest consensus. Someone else re-dropped it. In order to prevent further incidents like this again, I suggest that you contact the closer, BDD. Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 23:36, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George is right. It's basically never right to unilaterally reverse the move of an RM. I understand in this case that only one editor's opinion was involved in said RM, but because the article had been the subject of an RM, it needs to be treated as "potentially controversial" per WP:RMT. Given the dearth of participation, opening a new RM to restore the "The" would be fine. --BDD (talk) 23:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Space rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Space Oddity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firefly front cover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Firefly front cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serenity (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mobius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jubilation (The Band album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Doherty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glad Tidings and all that ...

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Harrison template

Hi The Wookieepedian. A few of your recent edits to Harrison album articles have come up on my watch list and I see they're related to changes you've made to the GH template. I'm a bit confused by these – for instance, in a WP:The Beatles talk discussion some time back, Evanh2008 established that Electronic Sound should be shown as Harrison's first studio album. Along with that, there's now misrepresentation on the template with Wonderwall Music removed from a soundtrack field to sit (with Elec Sound) under Related Articles/Albums. It's a misrepresentation because Wonderwall was indeed a purpose-made soundtrack album, whereas items included in Related Articles are (logically) projects that Harrison worked on with/for others, collaborations, extracurricular activities etc. In other words, Wonderwall and Electronic Sound were releases under his own name and so should be included among those uppermost fields in the template, surely.

I could be missing something, I admit, but that's the way I see the distinction. It might be an idea to raise this issue at the project's talk page, do you think? JG66 (talk) 06:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Thing is, your rationale isn't consistent with the Lennon temp, as far as I can see. Two Virgins, Life with the Lions etc appear under an "Experimental" field there – they're not buried away in "Related". That treatment on Temp:Lennon seems logical, I think, and Wonderwall and Elec Sound were full-fledged Harrison releases, just like those experimental works by Lennon. (In fact, more so than the latter, which were Lennon–Ono collaborations, of course.) If in doubt, I really think we ought to run this by the Beatles talk page, you know? Cheers, JG66 (talk) 12:29, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Harrison US Tour 1974, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Forum and The Spectrum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re '74 tour

Ah, you beat me to it with starting that article! In fact, I'd long been planning one, offline (it's only been in the planning stages for around, oh, two years now …) So much to say about that tour – it's definitely one I'd like to take to GA sometime. With a lot of work beforehand.

Thanks for your comment about retitling. Thing is, I'm totally ignorant of the process. The title should be George Harrison–Ravi Shankar 1974 North American Tour, as far as I can tell (with an en [or short dash] between their names, not a hyphen or minus sign) – but how do I change it to that wording, do you know? Cheers, JG66 (talk) 05:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Back again. With that tour chronology you've added, what's really needed – because the info currently sits under the heading "George Harrison and Ravi Shankar" – is two separate chronologies. One for GH that gives the 1991 Japanese tour; another for Ravi, referring to the earlier Music Festival from India tour of Europe. Any idea how to go about that, to have two tour chronologies, but neither of them actually follow the wording of the infobox's artists for this specific tour? (More signs of my zero capability when it comes to formatting …) JG66 (talk) 05:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archived from my user page

Deckiller to The Wookieepedian: Excellent work on the Star Wars articles! Have a Barnstar! (See: Archive 2)

For bringing *Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace* to FA status! — **Deckill e r** 16:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Is it accurate to say that your previous Wikipedia account was indeffed? Did you get permission to use another account, or are you evading a block that is still active? GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, The Wookieepedian. You have new messages at Talk:Canadian Rock (The Band album).
Message added 02:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dudel250 (talk) 02:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Harrison discography

added a link pointing to Walter Everett

Joe Cocker!

added a link pointing to Walter Everett

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FAC for xx (album)

Hi! Would you care to review or comment on my FA nomination of the article xx (album)? The review page has been inactive since I nominated it a week ago, so anything would be appreciated to start the process. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Paul McCartney does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Rezonansowy (talk | contribs) 17:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:13, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dear The Wookieepedian,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Dylan discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Howe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles Invite

Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.

Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet!

Todo list:

Global account

Hi The Wookieepedian! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doug Clifford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of R. Tam sessions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. Tam sessions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Tam sessions (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 05:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Get a haircut! Love your name. Two kinds of pork^Makin'_Bacon 03:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jorma Kaukonen page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! And a strange request

Hello! I don't believe we've ever interacted before (and if we have, my apologies). I'm Gen. Quon, and I'm a user pretty active in the X-Files, The Office, and Adventure Time fandoms. Anyway, I'm currently in grad school working on an MA thesis on Wikipedia, fandom, and canon, and I saw on the talk page of Star Wars canon that you were/are pretty active in the Star Wars fandom. I was wondering if I could ask you a few (~10) questions about how fans like yourself aggregate and define "canon" on Wikipedia in regards to cultural media objects (e.g. TV shows, movies)? You're under no obligation to say yes, but I just thought I'd ask! I'm sorry that this might seem super-weird or out of the blue!--Gen. Quon (Talk)

Have you been using these other blocked accounts?

FuhCallYall (talk · contribs), TrumpTakesADump (talk · contribs), TruckFump (talk · contribs) and UncleTomCarson (talk · contribs)? Doug Weller talk 11:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DS9logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DS9logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tvyoungindcro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tvyoungindcro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YoungIndyJones V1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YoungIndyJones V1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Wookieepedian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TAS title.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TAS title.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Outboundflightfrontcover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Outboundflightfrontcover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Blade Runner spin-offs has been nominated for merging

Category:Blade Runner spin-offs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 05:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Unseen Queen (2005).jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Unseen Queen (2005).jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Firefly (TV series) spin-offs

A tag has been placed on Category:Firefly (TV series) spin-offs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Jard Dooku" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jard Dooku and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Jard Dooku until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 17:24, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheStoryofStarWars.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheStoryofStarWars.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Firefly (franchise) terminology has been nominated for merging

Category:Firefly (franchise) terminology has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]