User talk:The Younger

I'm afraid I must disagree with your concept of remaining neutral. A statement that Shorstein arrived at FOP headquarters uninvited and people cheered when he left is not biased, it is a fact, substantiated by a reliable source. Wikipedia does not try to sanitize an article by removing negative or unpleasant information as long as it is accurate and comes from reliable sources. Specifically, what passages do you feel are not neutral and based on which NPOV policy? Mgreason (talk) 01:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusion of Shorstein showing up uninvited and people cheering when he left, I suppose, is not a big deal. Language like "if there was any question that law enforcement didn't like shorsetin, it was settled then," is blatant commentary. I have no problem with all the facts being included, they just need to be portrayed neutrally. The Younger (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your view of "if there was any question...". I was not offended by your changes, just wanted to be sure that a concensus is reached before a block of sourced text is removed. Mgreason (talk) 15:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]