User talk:The lad searches the night for his newts
The lad searches the night for his newts, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi The lad searches the night for his newts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC) |
GA review of Calugula (film)
[edit]Your lack of experience in Wikipedia and your failure to adhere to GA instructions makes your review inappropriate. Go ahead and revert yourself. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
This is utterly childish. If you have a problem with my listing the article as GA, open a GA review, don't try to whitewash history in a Stalinist fashion because you don't agree with my review. The lad searches the night for his newts (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- You need to assume good faith. We could take the review to GAR, but I'd highly anticipate a broad consensus to delist on the grounds that the review was insubstantial. So it is far easier to ignore that rule for the good of the project and just re-run the review again. I have left comments where I believe the article could be fixed, and invite people to act upon them, provided they have the relevant sources. At the end of the day, the most important point is : Are we improving the article? That's it. Snapping at people who have a higher perception of article quality than you will win you no friends. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
issue on another article
[edit]Hi,
I nominated an article for GA status and a reviewer began to work on it. However the reviewer ran into some kind of issue where they had to stop being a reviewer - some topic they were not allowed to handle I think. They asked for another reviewer to take over but I have no idea how to do that. If you have any suggestion I'd welcome it - see Talk:Nipo T. Strongheart/GA1. --Smkolins (talk) 10:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- hoping this is resolved - posted to the GA help section… --Smkolins (talk) 01:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, The lad searches the night for his newts. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Mudvayne at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 03:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armageddon (underground comic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you are re-reviewing Caligula at GAN after it failed. It is, however, not how it works since it wasn't placed back on GAN. If you have a problem with it failing its GAN, you should instead take it to WP:GAR and notify User:Ritchie333 about this. GamerPro64 02:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Have you thought about taking this up to an admin or going to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about it? Or even the GAN talk page? GamerPro64 05:29, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
![]()
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |