User talk:Thearmed1

You also seem to believe that I'm the same spammer that you got blocked earlier. And you also fail to recognize the reference to the official Sierra announcement which states that the multiplayer servers were shut down. Wikipedia is supposed to be a source of information, yet it seems that you want any useful information to be removed.

The section is there solely to help the Empire Earth community and there was no problem with it being there until you came along.

173.89.236.193 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I didn't notice that someone moved it up there awhile back, but that still doesn't explain why you think players should be left in the dark about an alternative multiplayer experience.

173.89.236.193 (talk) 21:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're still evading the point I'm getting at.

By any standards, what makes Empire Earth Heaven's link Wikipedia-worthy? A half-dozen references are from that fansite and I don't see where it's listed as "official." Also, the Wikipedia's standards say that everything must be from "reliable, published sources." Technically, any information uploaded to the internet for public viewing is considered published. On the other hand, only opinion can determine what is reliable. This totally contradicts the principle of making this encyclopedia entirely fact.

173.89.236.193 (talk) 22:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why do you have this burning desire to be the Empire Earth Wikipedia page watchdog?

173.89.236.193 (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to start your childish crap again? Stop deleting relevant information and stop adding blatant lies to the Empire Earth section.

70.184.74.229 (talk) 05:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Thank you for making a report about 70.184.74.229 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Toddst1 (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The spam link is now blocked.--Thearmed1 (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]