User talk:Thegreenspokeperson

Page moved

The article you posted on your user talk page has been moved to User:KEN Greenbook/sandbox. Your talk page is not a space for posting draft articles. Your sandbox is meant for that purpose.

You also have a declined submission at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEN Holdings Berhad. Please continue improving your article there. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited this article. KEN Greenbook (talk) 00:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Kindly approve this part of the submission. Thank you. KEN Greenbook (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly revert on whether the latest submission is approved. Thanks. KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have not re-submitted it yet (see the button at the top of the most recent declined submission request). Also the article still needs improvements. It would not be approved in its current state even if you did re-submit it. Several of the references are not accessible, and the article still has a promotional tone. Please also see WP:CITE for guidance on how to cite sources; this aspect of your article really needs cleaning up. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I have re-submitted. Please take a look. Thanks. KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have not re-submitted anything.

No changes have been made to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KEN Holdings Berhad since it was declined.

You have made changes to your sandbox but you have not submitted it for review. Is that the article you want reviewed? If so, I can delete the other one. I have tagged the one in your sandbox for submitting to Wikipedia:Articles for creation for review. Your sandbox has a 'submit' link at the top of the page.

But don't submit it yet. Do some reference cleanup first.

I have repaired your reference tagging. The closing tag of a reference is </ref> but you were using <ref/>. This was causing the bulk of your article to disappear from view.

I have also consolidated some identical references, see what I did with reference 2, theedgemalaysia. Named references do end with a closing slash after the first use (in this case, see what I did with the cases of <ref name="theedgemalaysia"/>. You should consolidate the other duplicate references in a similar way before submitting. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, KEN Greenbook. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 07:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The content was revised some time back. However, there is no notification of whether the revised content is in agreement with Wikipedia's guidelines or not. The content is no longer promotional in nature. Awaiting approval of content to go live. Thank you.KEN Greenbook (talk) 00:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly approve amended version of text. Thank you. KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KEN Damansara Trilogy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KEN Damansara Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 08:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"KEN Damansara Trilogy" has been removed. Kindly review and approve. Thank you. KEN Greenbook (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear TheLongTone ... the content has been revised and awaiting review and approval. Thank you. KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Both of your articles, in your sandbox and at Articles for creation, are written in a promotional tone. They are advertisements. Wikipedia must not be used as a publicity medium. As such, they would not be accepted in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-submitted. Please take a look. Thanks. KEN Greenbook (talk) 08:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:KEN Greenbook (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 20:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, amended and re-submitted. KEN Greenbook (talk) 06:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEN Greenbook (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KEN Greenbook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thegreenspokeperson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 10:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Draft:KEN Greenbook, and I noticed that your username, "KEN Greenbook", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 10:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEN Greenbook (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KEN Greenbook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 18:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:KEN Greenbook concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:KEN Greenbook, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KEN Greenbook

Hello, KEN Greenbook. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "KEN Greenbook".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:KEN Greenbook}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KEN Greenbook/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Holdings (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ken Holdings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEN Greenbook (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KEN Greenbook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:KEN Holdings Berhad.png

Thanks for uploading File:KEN Holdings Berhad.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Holdings (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources should be unrelated to the company, that have written objectively about it. The sources mostly appear to be its own annual reports.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ken Holdings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ken Holdings (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

We understand the reason i get blocked. Here we promise will take into serious consideration before i submit any article for review. First of all, it is our first time want to submit wikipedia article.

Decline reason:

>We understand the reason i get blocked.
No you haven't, because the new username you have supplied is still unacceptable. MER-C 05:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Category:Redirects from moves. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Wikipedian Sign Language Paine 15:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ken Holdings (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ken Holdings and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

KEN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The reasons we get blocked are because of the way we write the article content consists of promotional writing style and we are using promotional username. However, the reason we want to create an article in Wikipedia is to act as a general profile of our organization such as Sime Darby, SP Setia in Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Multiple users are not allowed to use one account. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 07:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

KEN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Currently, I’m the person in charge for this account only. For your information, in future I will definitely ask help from the reviewer's talk page before I submit the article for review approval.

Decline reason:

You can't use that name. First, it's the name of your company. Second, someone presumably called Ken already has it. Peridon (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason given to lift the block, no username provided. Yamla (talk) 00:44, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Your proposed new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Your reason here

Decline reason:

You seem to be unable to understand our policy and follow the directions for use of this unblock template. See WP:CIR. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC) OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously need to fill out the form in order to get unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 00:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16166 was submitted on Jul 18, 2016 10:28:52. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Thegreenspokeperson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16192 was submitted on Jul 21, 2016 01:06:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC) NEW=thegreenspokeperson REASON=Previous username has been blocked because it has been considered as promotional name.[reply]

August 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline. If you believe that your user page does not violate our guideline, please leave a note on this page. Alternatively you may add {{Db-u1}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's user page guideline. See in particular WP:FAKEARTICLE. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AllyD: Hi Ally, actually what do you mean by may not meet? Could you please elaborate more since it is my first time creating articles on Wikipedia. It would be great if you could guide me on it. Thegreenspokeperson (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Just to update you, I did some amendment on it, perhaps if you could like briefly check it for me? Appreciate if you could spare some time to look at it.[reply]

@AllyD: Hi Ally, just to highlight to you again that I have did some amendment on it. Could you check it for me? Appreciate if you could spare some time to look at it.Thegreenspokeperson (talk) 07:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AllyD was talking about your user page. You did not make any "amendments", you blanked it. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KEN Holdings Berhad (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from www.utar.edu.my/fes/file/2011%20Archive.docx. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phil roc^{My contribs} 16:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from www.utar.edu.my/fes/file/2011%20Archive.docx, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Draft talk:KEN Holdings Berhad and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Draft:KEN Holdings Berhad, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:KEN Holdings Berhad. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:KEN Holdings Berhad with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:KEN Holdings Berhad saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Phil roc^{My contribs} 16:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Philroc: Hi Philroc, i have look into the link that you have attached. But, our article seems do not have anything related to it as the archive file is the schedule of talk at the UTAR. Appreciate if you could spare some time to look at it.Thegreenspokeperson (talk) 08:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ken Holdings

Hello, Thegreenspokeperson. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ken Holdings".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 08:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ken Holdings Berhad concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ken Holdings Berhad, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ken Holdings Berhad

Hello, Thegreenspokeperson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ken Holdings Berhad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Logo, Ken Holdings Berhad, Aug 2016.png

The file File:Logo, Ken Holdings Berhad, Aug 2016.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:Ken Holdings. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]