Jump to content

User talk:TheoMax42651

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, TheoMax42651, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 14:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Schism (October 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TheoMax42651! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:William Schism has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William Schism. Thanks! BD2412 T 03:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schism v. United States has been accepted

[edit]
Schism v. United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 21:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Fascism, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CO2 Coalition. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at CO2 Coalition. Stop edit warring, and please edit neutrally. The second sentence of your preferred version is decidedly non-neutral. Drmies (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (CO2 Coalition) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:14, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, after I warned you, you had to go and do it again, and again. That makes 5 reverts, if I'm counting correctly--including one while not logged in. You may also want to read WP:COI and act accordingly. Drmies (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]