User talk:Thewarison101

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Counting Crows, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Counting Crows was changed by Thewarison101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956492 on 2012-04-09T22:30:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hi Records. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hi Records was changed by Thewarison101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.987991 on 2012-04-09T22:31:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Proteuxoa marginalis, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Proteuxoa marginalis was changed by Thewarison101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948298 on 2012-04-09T22:33:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tacitus with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lake Travis High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lake Travis High School was changed by Thewarison101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981194 on 2012-05-18T23:52:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:52, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dripping Springs Independent School District. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gwen Chan 23:53, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin, Texas, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Austin, Texas was changed by Thewarison101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956824 on 2012-05-19T00:36:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Facebook, Inc., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 00:41, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Thewarison101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

173.172.123.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Thewarison101". The reason given for Thewarison101's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: Materialscientist (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are directly blocked - and apparently with good reason. See WP:GAB (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reason= I understand that vandalism is wrong, and i was messing around those days. I promise not to vandalize the site again and would like to be unblocked and being able to prove my self by making helpful improvements and stopping vandals. Please re-review my request for an unblock and i admit to what I was doing. At least let me have a clean start with a new account on my IP address so I can start over. Thank You for any consideration of my request. How can I convince you?|decline=I have looked through all of your edits, which date from early April, and am unable to find any at all which are even remotely appropriate for this encyclopedia. You say that you were "messing about" those days; it is not clear to me why you felt that messing about, last month, was acceptable behaviour. I do not believe that you would have stopped vandalising had you not been blocked. You have the option now of convincing us that I am wrong. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Please suggest at 2-3 constructive edits you would make. WilliamH (talk) 18:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have few things about Ronald Reagan, St Michael's Catholic Academy, a new article about Counting crows new tour and a few other things to contribute.

{{unblock reason= I understand that vandalism is wrong, and i was messing around those days. I promise not to vandalize the site again and would like to be unblocked and being able to prove my self by making helpful improvements and stopping vandals. Please re-review my request for an unblock and i admit to what I was doing. At least let me have a clean start with a new account on my IP address so I can start over. Thank You for any consideration of my request. How can I convince you?}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thewarison101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In regards to WilliamH I have few things about Ronald Reagan, St Michael's Catholic Academy, a new article about Counting crows new tour and a few other things to contribute. Please consider this as well as my earlier request. I understand that vandalism is wrong, and i was messing around those days. I promise not to vandalize the site again and would like to be unblocked and being able to prove my self by making helpful improvements and stopping vandals. Please re-review my request for an unblock and i admit to what I was doing. At least let me have a clean start with a new account on my IP address so I can start over. Thank You for any consideration of my request.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I'm not buying this. If you understood that vandalism was wrong, why did you keep "messing around" despite all the above warnings? Nick-D (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop messing around with other people's comments and changing them to say things they didn't say, or you will lose your ability to edit here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thewarison101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that all this is wrong, and I am sorry and would like to now try to help the Wiki community. Please, Please review this request and give me a day or something to prove myself, or at least let me create a new account. I want to help, and am sorry. Please...

Decline reason:

Do you honestly think we'll believe you when you claim that you've mended your ways, while at the same time you are faking Nick-D's comments to make it look like he called you an idiot? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thewarison101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: I understand, i was messing around with my talk page, and i would agree that at times, i am an idiot. Please unblock, i dont know what else to say or do.

Decline reason:

Even while you are saying this, you were playing around more, such as changing another user's "decline" to "accept", per below. Everything you've done, from your blatant vandalism, to vandalizing after making this request, shows bad faith. In short, it appears highly unlikely that unblocking you would result in any benefit to the encyclopedia and probably would result in quite the opposite.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And now you just did this ! I have revoked your Talk pages access, because you're just trolling here. Should a reviewing admin disagree with me and think you should be unblocked, they will restore your ability to edit here when they unblock you - but I really don't think there is a high likelihood of that. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your crystal ball is working.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]