User talk:Tigerassault

Fair use rationale for Image:Vasco Da gama POW camp.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vasco Da gama POW camp.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Karnataka, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SBC-YPR (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Please don't call a constructive edit 'vandalism' just because it did not fit in with your narrow views on the subject. You will note that my supposed vandalism has been reinstated by other editors. BTW, have you yourself read that welcome page? Please read it.Tigerassault (talk) 07:14, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Flag of Karnataka

My comments here. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Flags

From user talk:SBC-YPR#Bengaluru

Perhaps you do not know that Karnataka has it's own flag and state anthem.......Heights of dumbness... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually I know that Karnataka does not have its own official flag. That makes you the dumb height. :) Tigerassault (talk) 06:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your Effort

Even though I don't agree with you on many issues, especially regarding the Invasion of Goa and Portugal, I sincerely appreciate your different POV's and the information that you have researched and strive in conveyeing. Although your POV of Portuguese culture both in India and current Portuguese society seem quite incomplete (and when referring to Portugal itself dated also), your research has shed interesting and different elements which I think are enrichening to gain greater knowledge of the issue. Apart from some emotive comments, it also displays that you are open to discussing, informing and learning; the truth is that alone we can't reason anything out. Keep in touch and all the best to you Tigerassault.Goali (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Portugal India Locator.png

Thanks for uploading File:Portugal India Locator.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Tigerassault, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Tigerassault/Goa. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Tigerassault, The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Dear Tigerassault,

After many strenuous efforts, and even if I am not yet totally sure, I think I have finally found the correct way to reply to the message you left for me one year ago. I hope that my reply will reach you.

You suppressed my edit to the statement made by Air Marshal Raghavendran about Portuguese POWs in Goa, in the article 1961 Indian Annexation of Goa, on the basis that I had probably written a personal rebuke to the said statement and had then concocted a source to back it up. You based your conviction on the fact that the Air Marshal’s statement had been published in his 2004 memoirs, so it would be highly unlikely (‘outside of a time machine scenario’) that the Mozambican daily newspaper Notícias (the source I had mentioned) had commented on such statement 42 years prior to its making.

I do not know if Air Marshal Raghavendran published his statement in 2004, but I remember very well that a similar opinion had been commented by Notícias soon after the 1961 annexation of Goa, Damão and Diu, for I was living in Mozambique at the time and was already sufficiently grown-up and attentive to events as emotional as the one in question (as you will certainly understand, and regardless of further political considerations, the annexation of Portuguese India was experienced as a rude moral shock by the average citizen in Portugal, including the overseas territories under Portuguese sovereignty at the time; it had an indelible effect on me).

The said opinion by an Indian officer was so similar to the one you attribute to Air Marshal Raghavendran that I assumed they were one and the same. Mr Raghavendran may well have published, in his 2004 memoirs, a statement he had expressed over 40 years earlier. No ‘time machine scenario’ is required to explain this.

And as I found that in its previous form the article 1961 Indian Annexation of Goa was biased, I thought it would only be fair to introduce some type of counterweight to the opinion of an officer from the winning side about prisoners from the losing side in a hugely unequal war, besides of the fact that the prisoners in question were detained under deplorable conditions.

But, of course, I cannot produce any documentary evidence (a link or a scanned copy) of an editorial published by Notícias 50 years ago, whether the statement that the editorial referred to was made by Mr Raghavendran or by any other Indian officer.

At any rate, I doubt that producing such evidence would change anything. I have sound reasons to presume that, even then, my edit would be excluded, because I had inserted another one, about an interview, a few years ago, of RTP (the Portuguese public Radio and Television station) with a Portuguese actor who was a soldier in Goa at the time of the annexation, in which he declared that food was extremely bad in the prisoners’ camps, practically restricted to a daily bowl of rice, until one day they started to receive meat, by coincidence (or not) at the same time that the numerous errant dogs and cats had mysteriously vanished from the surrounding area... I quoted this interview with a due indication of the source (RTP), but that did not prevent my edit from being suppressed.

More recently, I had inserted another edit about the escape attempt of a group of Portuguese POWs. The attempt failed, as the captain of an Italian ship treacherously surrendered them to the Indian authorities. Then, as a reprisal, an Indian lieutenant attacked General Carlos Azeredo with a stick, yelling ‘Run! Run!’, to which Azeredo replied "Vai bardamerda" (something equivalent to ‘Go to hell’), only to be savagely spanked until he eventually fainted.

I duly indicated the source of these data: an article titled A Fuga de Alparqueiros, published in VISÃO HISTÓRIA magazine (#14, December 2011, p. 45). Yet, not only my edit was suppressed but I also received the following warning in May 2012: "This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 1961 Indian annexation of Goa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NOTE: I noticed that a lot of your inputs on the aforementioned page are violations of our above policy, as well as WP:Neutral point of view and WP:Verifiability. Last warning, if you continue to do this, I guarantee you that you will be BLOCKED very soon. Take heed~! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 00:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC)."

I suspect that the problem here is not so much my ‘inserting [of] unpublished information’ (I can, at any moment, send a copy of the VISÃO HISTÓRIA magazine in question; please tell me how, and I will do it) as the fact that my edits are excessively hurting for Indian pride.

So, my dear Tigerassault, as you seem to have the power to do it, you may leave your article in its current, unfair form. Just do not implicitly accuse me of dishonesty. Yours sincerely, Namaacha (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear Namaacha, I recall that your edit started with the words "However, this statement can be explained as the desperate need of an Indian officer to raise his own morale" The word 'Desperate' here being your personal opinion. Then you went on to say " India, an extremely poor, backward and underdeveloped Third World country" which was again your largely irrelevant personal analysis of India's economy (however right you may have been). Then you referred to "a long and humiliating domination by the United Kingdom" which is again your irrelevant personal analysis of the colonial era. And then finally you do not mention anywhere in these sentences that this is what some editor of some newspaper in Mozambique had to say... making it look like it part of a slightly preachy narrative. And then I note how you first added how "this statement can be explained" and then went on to add - in a later edit - a source that no one could verify... not even yourself.

Of course, you will appreciate that Air Marshal Raghavendran had just been promoted from Flight Lieutenant in 1961, and would not have been so important a person to be quoted anywhere about his views on the Portuguese POWs. These statements came out in his memoirs only many many years later, after he had retired. Tigerassault (talk) 19:13, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Stop inserting unsourced and delibaterly wrong information

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 1961 Indian annexation of Goa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.Neelkamala (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

I would not like to experiment. I am adding authentic information with sources as per approved policies. YOU are the one removing these wiothout reason because they do not suscribe to your POV. You, sir, are trying vehemently to keep any information taht reflects badly on your own POV out of this article. Tigerassault (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Indian annexation of Goa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Neelkamala (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tigerassault. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tigerassault. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Liberation cheer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Liberation cheer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Surrender with locals.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Surrender with locals.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Vasco Da gama POW camp.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Vasco Da gama POW camp.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:40, 16 June 2020 (UTC)