User talk:Tim.egalut

Welcome!

Hello, Tim.egalut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S_peakF_ree (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret

The article Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Instructional material, not encyclopedic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. S_peakF_ree (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article

I have removed the proposed deletion message from your new article as it is clearly not intended to be instructional, but rather to be a book review of a published book. However, I should tell you that the subject book does not appear to meet the criteria for inclusion. A self-published book about an obscure topic of Jewish mysticism by an author with no other publications to his credit is an unlikely candidate for an encyclopedia article. Unless you can provide some sort of proof that this book is notable, the article will likely be deleted. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason that you have removed the author's name from this article? The author's name is clearly shown on the image of the book cover at Amazon. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tim.egalut. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Tim.egalut. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Tim.egalut. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introduction To Hebrew Logic. Part One: The Ketoret until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to Hebrew Logic

The following is moved from the user's page to the user's talk page, as it is obviously intended to be a communication to this user.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am a friend of Salvia J. and was asked to comment to this discussion. I must dispute both notability and accuracy:

Notability:

The book (Introduction to Hebrew Logic) provides a revolutionary model. According to this model the speed of light consist of two components Pc and Fc. Since only Pc is observant we recognize Pc as C (the speed of light). Fc is the component that explains why the speed of light seems to be constant. Sending beam X against beam Y , the two beams will move at each other at the constant speed of light (C), this is the conventional theory of relativity.

Sending two locomotors(X and Y) against each other at the speed of 90 Miles per Hour the two locomotors will collide at 180 M/H. What makes the speed of light so different that it doesn’t bound by simple Algebra? This exactly what the book Introduction to Hebrew Logic answers. Let say that the front wheels of engines x and y are welded by unbreakable welds to the same steel track. Assuming that the engines are powerful enough, the track will bend. The shape and frequency, or the amplitude, of the bended rails is determined by the power of the two engines (and other factors such as the qualities of the steel). Since we can observe only one engine (Pc) we mistake the result of the two engines (Pc + Fc) as the speed of only one (Pc). In our mind Pc=C, whereas in nature C=Pc+Fc. According to Introduction to Hebrew Logic - quantum at the edge of the beam triggers Pc and Fc. This is the meeting point of the theory of relativity, quantum physics, and string theory. Since beam X is riding on Y’s Fc, and since beam Y is riding on X’s Fc, the speed doesn’t change it stays C, the only different is that now we can observe two opposite beams in the observable space. This model is as revolutionary as Kant’s Copernican revolution, and Einstien’s theory of relativity.

Accuracy:

In my view the account provided by tim.egalut should be deleted on account of accuracy, rather that notability. The book offers a unifying theory of everything in chapters 8 and 9, all the other chapters relates to philosophy in its widest meaning: ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and philosophy of science.

Miscellaneous: Originally the book was intended for circulation only among friends of Salvia J. Yeshiva students discovered the book Xeroxed it and circulate it as an underground book of Zohar. Therefore circulation is now open for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freindofsalvia (talk • contribs)

Notice

Please delete your entrance about the book. Please do not contact any friend of salvia J. Please follow the instructions you got in the notice e-mail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freindofsalvia (talk • contribs) 18:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]