Jump to content

User talk:TimCod

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to ICD-10 Chapter II: Neoplasms; Chapter III: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: ICD-10 Chapter II: Neoplasms; Chapter III: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism was changed by TimCod (u) (t) deleting 27863 characters on 2008-02-09T16:51:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but what IS this? Please reply on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility.. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please follow the process explained above if you wish to contest deletion. Also note that the dbbio tag applies to companies and other groups not just people. ukexpat (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 15:15, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion notice

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges by removing speedy deletion tags. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 15:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your use of sockpuppet accounts to evade this block and your continued personal attacks, I have extended this block to 48 hours. Please wait out the block. Further creation of sockpuppet accounts will result in a significantly longer block. If you wish to dispute this block, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 15:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]