User talk:TimHardwell

This is TimHardwell's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohamed Bah (May 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DannyS712 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DannyS712 (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimHardwell! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DannyS712 (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mohamed Bah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mohamed Bah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DannyS712 (talk) 02:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Breezeagentyt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:45, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TimHardwell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to apologize to Wikipedia contributors and staff members to deal with this. I have been Wikipedia for 2 years now, Over those 2 years I have learnt how to make an article about a subject. I have been watching over 50 YouTube videos to learn how to do advance your skills. Recently I have been behaving very stubborn such as abusing the website. I've understand what I did which was wrong and I would like get a chance to approve myself as a editor. I learnt that I should not make promotional articles which I was wrong to do and Do unnecessary edits to articles that published already without editing. If I was unblocked, I would now contribute Wikipedia with rightful information. I would make important edits and do do research on my edits. Writing on Wikipedia is like writing a English essay as a homework, this felt like it improved my ways of writing. Since once I got banned I have been reading the why I got blocked and what I need to change to unblock. This made me learn my mistakes of being very rude and stubborn. I made a new account called TimHardwell, my real name so I can create a sandbox article to practise my self to write a article that i have been doing college as a project. Personally I didn't know you should not create an another account if your current account is blocked. If I get unblocked, I would like to create more Articles of important people on this account. This account feels special as it was created in 2017, and I have been using it everyday to find information or resources to helped me with my real life essays. Thank you for reading my message

Decline reason:

You've already got several unblock requests open on your other account, and as a sockpuppet, this account won't be unblocked. —DoRD (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.