User talk:Tim Fordham-Moss

License tagging for File:Stermins exterior 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stermins exterior 3.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

St Ermin's hotel

Tim, welcome to Wikipedia. Glad to see that someone is writing an article on the St Vermins. I think you've made a good start on it but there are some improvements. The most obvious ommission is that there are no references in the article so verifiying any of the content isn't easy. If you have paper or web references these can be dropped in quite easily as bare url or book title, author and page number now and extended later. Just type the url and put <ref> </ref> around it. At the bottom of the page add a references section with {{reflist}} in it and the references will appear. See WP:REFSTART for more information on this.

The lead section should be the taster and summary of the rest of the article. I have to say at the moment it reads like an advert not an encyclopedia. Have a look at other building articles e.g. St Pancras railway station and try and follow that format. I owuld suggest that the introduction section is the history or the building, the current history section is more about the locale rather than the building and unless relevant is probably best left out as it should be in the article on Westminster. Some of it e.g. the reference to a St Ermin's chapel should stay as it explains why the hotel is named as it is as should reference to Caxton Hall especially if some of the celebs named then used the hotel before or afterwards.

"Of spies" etc is really interesting but will need extensive referencing to avoid being taken as hearsay.

The architecture deserves a section of it's own and I would leave the refit and current facilities until last

If you need a hand with anything just leave a note on my talkpage. Don't worry about the previous message you got. Image files that aren't copyright free i.e. fair use only shouldn't be used until the article is moved out of Articles for creation so the bot just tagged them. NtheP (talk) 10:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Tim, it's entirely the right way to message me but I've just moved it to a new section at the bottom but we can carry on the conversation here. I've added your talkpage to my watch list so I'll see any replies. Prior to the refit I stayed there quite a lot as I spend a lot of time in a large office in the area and those of us who stayed all called it the St Vermins - as an affectionate name for such a wonderfully old fashioned place than a comment on hygeine. If the maps are OS ones as long as they are over 50 years old (I think) then they are released by the OS for reuse without licencing issues. Don't worry about making mistakes, we all started off here knowing nothing about how it all comes together and we work up from that level. NtheP (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

St Ermin's Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

★ Pikks ★ ^MsG 23:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Cummins

The article Jon Cummins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Some mentions, and very accomplished, but not the type of in-depth coverage needed to pass GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)