User talk:Timatcounterstrain
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Timatcounterstrain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 20:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Counterstrain. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Counterstrain page
[edit]Got your last message, and all I can recommend is that either you allow the additions that were made and I will make sure to remove the elements that clearly violate Wiki's guidelines or you need to figure out how to edit this page and have it renamed to its proper title, "Jones - Strain and Counterstrain". It is not an accurate description of current Counterstrain which is completely based in a modern scientific understanding of the various fascial properties of proprioception and fascial contraction. Please see the following links:
https://3dcounterstrain.com/how-it-works/ https://counterstrainacademy.com/fascial-counterstrain-origin-and-evolution-of-this-modern-osteopathic-approach/ http://www.jiscs.com/PDFs/FascialSCSIntroMar2013.pdf
Tim Timatcounterstrain (talk) 00:29, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Timatcounterstrain, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Timatcounterstrain! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 January 2017 (UTC) |