User talk:Timi422

Timi422, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Timi422! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Abimbola Ogunnowo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abimbola Ogunnowo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abimbola Ogunnowo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 20:29, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria[edit]

Hello Timi, since you are involved with Nigerian articles, could you add your username to the participant list to keep abreast of information surrounding the WikiProject? Regards. HandsomeBoy (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How do I, do that HandsomeBoy?--Timi422 (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its very easy, follow this link then add your username to the participants list. You add your account by using the four tildes that is normally used to sign your posts. You seem to learn things quite fast, as your first article was very well written for a completely new editor. All things being equal, I am confident if you continue at that pace, you will be a huge asset to WikiProject Nigeria. Welcome to Wikipedia once again. HandsomeBoy (talk) 08:25, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Ikeji for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Ikeji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Ikeji (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abimbola Ogunnowo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abimbola Ogunnowo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abimbola Ogunnowo (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Kentalky (jockey)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DJ Kentalky (jockey), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The editor whose username is Z0 13:08, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Z0 Please explain why the article was nominated for speedy deletion and also I just saw this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj Kentalky an it was in 2016 when the article lack alot. This is 2018 and the article now meet Wikipedia guideline for WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO which it fails as of 2016. How can I apply or rather appeal for a restoration on the article recently deleted?

Please explain, am new here--Timi422 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article was nominated for speedy deletion because the new version was similar to the 2016 version, which was deleted via the AFD process. Maybe you could ask the admin who deleted the page for more information. The editor whose username is Z0 11:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Odunsi (The Engine) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odunsi (The Engine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odunsi (The Engine) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HandsomeBoy (talk) 18:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI case opened[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Timi422. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this has been archived at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oluwa2Chainz and the original case deleted. SpinningSpark 08:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

I have checked around block request it's 1% chance getting your account back unless you got temporally blocked, so me submitting an appeal wouldn't change anything. Either they reply to your request, you don't understand the reasons you got blocked for and deny your request..

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timi422 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong contributing to eligible article's that meet WP:GNG even if few of my edit's had case of COI edits which was made some years ago due to they where case of WP:TOOSOON when they where first written and making me look like a sockpuppet writing it now when they fully meet WP:GNG an so on and also for User:HandsomeBoy to had said this in the investigation as quoted " I am almost entirely sure this is the case of the latter. I just wish clerks will see reasons with me. Please note that he's an experienced editor so he knows what to say to keep his suspected COI articles in mainspace, and not be seen as a troublesome editor, by being in the good books of good faith editors" which makes this a case of retaliation against me, which block are not main to be used for, I hope an admin look into this.--Timi422 (talk) 06:43, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on a review of this user's editing history, I am satisfied that this user is a sock. Appeal declined. Further appeals should come from your master account. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:50, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It doesn't seem like you understand the reason behind your block. To be clear, you were blocked because an administrator believes you're the same person as User:Obari2Kay. If that's true, you'll need to appeal from that account (and only after careful consideration). If it's not true, that's the first and biggest thing you need to address and convince us of here. Right now, whether the articles you contributed to met GNG or not, and similar content-related issues, is wholly irrelevant to any unblock. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 06:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly understand the word sockpuppet Kevin and I understand they think am the same person that why am been disabled and blocked from editing, even on the investigation Risker made a statement as quoted "I note that there are a fair number of differences between the previously deleted articles and those versions created by User:Timi422" that to show you guy's am not whoever you mistaking me for, i also checked Obari2Kay and tracked it to Coal Press Nation Archive an saw mixing word's up was the main problem an that has always been the complained of User:Versace1608 as written on the talk page and I don't have same issues that is a more clear explanation.--Timi422 (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You said - "...even if few of my edit's had case of COI edits which was made some years ago due to they where case of WP:TOOSOON...", can you shed more light on this by explaining where you have COI connections? If you come out completely clean, disclosing the sock accounts, I'll intercede on your behalf to get unblocked as you've been civil in your discussions. HandsomeBoy (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HandsomeBoy you clearly said "you continue to create/significantly contribute to topics that are targets of same set of COI editors!" that lead to me saying "even if few of my edit's had case of COI edits which was made some years ago" and as for the word "WP:TOOSOON" was pointing on the first AFD "DJ Kentalky", "Odunsi (The Engine)" got which was a clear state of WP:TOOSOON. Hope you get me clear, so you don't get confused.--Timi422 (talk) 21:27, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop fighting with one another. Risker said that an admin with behavioral comparison experience should review the case and make a determination: I did, and I came to the belief that the evidence suggests you are this editor. I’ll be more than happy to show any reviewing admin this via email per WP:BEANS. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That was a false claim that all am saying, you can't shut me out just like that and expect me to accept being a sockpuppet of someone I never knew exited if not for the investigation that was opened would never had come across such name "Obari2Kay". It not my fault the article was deleted and the editor was disabled and blocked, the only thing we have or had in common is we both got interested in creating same article. No sockpuppet business and no eligible prove that show's am a sockpuppet so I don't understand how you carried out your behavioral comparison TonyBallioni please explain further.--Timi422 (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also as for HandsomeBoy I have a strong believe the reason for the investigation was to remove my vote from Odunsi (The Engine) as a blocked sock which can only be achieved by opening an investigation and making me look like a sockpuppet to achieve an SPI Case. All I have to say is what main to stay on Wikipedia would stay with or without me contributing as long as it met the necessary criteria which we both know. Also for the unblock request when is this going to be reviewed?.--Timi422 (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Could you email me your analysis, please? Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:37, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@L235: ygm. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Timi422 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Did I tell you I got multiple account? @L235:, So how would I appeal from a master account when their is no master account. Can you hear yourself, I think the best thing is to open a new account since it is stated "Note that using multiple accounts is allowed" so if you not going to open this getting a new account would be the next plan. An as for the recent article deleted, I wouldn't create it again but note Universal Music would do that themselves as long as this artist are under Universal they going to get a Wikipedia page. That complete fact we all know that, am opportune to know does name's because am a music lover and this are the new sound's rocking the Nigeria air wave, had sold out shows in UK and Ghana they also known as the new generational music and they the first set of people to start up the alternative music in Nigeria "Odunsi (The Engine)", "Tay Iwar", "Tomi Agape", "Nonso Amadi" and many more, I can keep listing but I wouldn't, I hope you all have a nice day with your decisions @HandsomeBoy: @TonyBallioni: @L235:.Timi422 (talk) 07:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having examined the SPI, your history, and the analysis offered by TonyBallioni, I also find the evidence of socking convincing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As above, I will email any admin the diffs that led me to block and I emailed Kevin, but I stand by this block and I won’t be explaining to an exceptionally deceptive sockmaster how I made the decision to block. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- For the avoidance of doubt, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia on any account or IP address – even if, as you assert, this is your only account, the block is still valid against you as a person until an appeal is successful, and any new account you create would be a violation of policy. I would suggest that any administrator who affirms the block on review of this block appeal also revoke talk page access. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I’ve gone ahead and revoked it as their last edit was essentially taunting the blocking and last reviewing admin. Offer above still stands to email any diffs for the outstanding unblock and any WP:UTRS appeal. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:51, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - @TonyBallioni: I'm happy to take a look over your evidence, so please feel free to send me an email. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Timi422 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22889 was submitted on Oct 08, 2018 08:34:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kentalky (November 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Frayae was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]