User talk:Timjones86

May 2016[edit]

You appear to be engaged in a slow edit war on Capital Punishment in Australia. If you insert that material again without first getting agreement on the talk page then I will submit a report with a request you be sanctioned ----Snowded ^TALK 10:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Shifting comment from my talk page, lets keep this in one place where other concerned editors can see it)

so I'm on your talk page so tell me whats wrong with my posts. Timjones86 (talk) 11:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient citation support and you have been told that. You need to read WP:BRD. You have been bold, you have been reverted you now discuss. You don't simply wait a bit and try it again to see if no one is watching. As I said, if you do that again then it is a report for edit warring. ----Snowded ^TALK 11:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Australia First Party— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 14:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership spills[edit]

Hi Tim, regarding your creation of both Next Australian Labor Party leadership spill and Next Liberal Party of Australia leadership spill: I've redirected both articles to the ALP/LPA articles, as the creation of these "spill" articles is entirely premature. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and hence: no spill has been announced, to assume one will occur is merely speculation, which is not what Wikipedia is about. Thank you, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 15:39, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the No2EU page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the We Demand a Referendum Now page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Independence from Europe page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the United Kingdom local elections, 2003 page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is related.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:12, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Timjones86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Australian Labor Party leadership spills, 2001[edit]

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Timjones86, thanks for creating Australian Labor Party leadership spills, 2001!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs a little work - additional citations and formatting of the bare url. If you need help, let me know, I would be happy to help.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 03:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Next Liberal Party of Australia leadership spill listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Liberal Party of Australia leadership spill. Since you had some involvement with the Next Liberal Party of Australia leadership spill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Next Australian Labor Party leadership spill listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Australian Labor Party leadership spill. Since you had some involvement with the Next Australian Labor Party leadership spill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 0217[edit]

Hello, I'm KoshVorlon. An edit that you recently made to Steyn von Ronge seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

I just removed the "White Supremist" that you added into to Steyn von Ronge's article. First, you can't use Wikipedia as a source for anything, second although you used the dailymaverick as a source, it doesn't describe Mr. von Ronge , or his party as "White Supremist". You'll need a reliable source that does otherwise, it will need to be removed per WP:BLP. I'm not South African, and it may be common knowledge that his party is white supremist, but without a reliable source, it can't be aded in! Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 13:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks.Timjones86 (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benn family for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benn family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benn family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Timjones86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]