User talk:Timmyonguitar

Welcome!

Hello, Timmyonguitar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vanjagenije (talk) 14:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bulleted list item

Spelling and grammar corrections

So far, all of your "corrections" to spelling and/or grammar have been incorrect. Please reconsider whether English spelling and grammar are areas you can be helpful in. Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you could be specific in giving such feedback. Thank you and your feedback is very much welcome Timmyonguitar (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cappella is properly spelled as two words, not one. [1] —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taken note of that. Will be much careful about making such mistakes going forward. Thank you C.Fred Timmyonguitar (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aluminum is the preferred spelling in articles about US subjects, per WP:ENGVAR. The past tense of plead is pled. [2] I don't think it's all your corrections, but it's a significant number. —C.Fred (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

C.Fred has noted a few, above, I'll add the rest here. (As of my comment that started this section, unfortunately it was all of them.)

[3]: You changed "kidnappers'" to "kidnapper's". The article indicates there was more than on kidnapper. The correct plural possessive adds the apostrophy after the "s": kidnappers -> kidnappers'. You also changed "moviegoers" to "movie goers". "Moviegoers" is one word.
[4] You changed "this" to "his". "This" makes sense in context. Your change from "hrw" to "Hor" seems to have been a guess; certainly not a spelling correction.
[5] In addition to other notes, he let them "tape" (i.e., record) the phone conversation. Yes, he let them "tap" the call (monitor it), but the recording of the call was important in context. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Inderjit Vasudevan Moorthy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Inderjit Vasudevan Moorthy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Everymorning (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Inderjit Vasudevan Moorthy, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Inderjit Vasudevan Moorthy. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Inderjit Vasudevan Moorthy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:07, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Inderjit vasudevan moorthy.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Inderjit vasudevan moorthy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inderjit moorthy.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Inderjit moorthy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Inderjit latest view from front.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Inderjit latest view from front.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.