User talk:Titodutta/CVU/Students/TheOriginalSoni

This is a subpage of Titodutta's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Test 01 discussion[edit]

Is there any word limit or something? I seriously doubt I might fall way short of it, thanks to my love for succinctness. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is not any word limit. Consider from this point of view, a newbie is asking you what is vandalism and you are explaining to him. Short answers will not be a problem, IMO! --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test done. Btw Q1 should not be ending with a question mark. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 21:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I am seeing if I can find someone to evaluate these answers! --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What next do we have? Are there any further tests? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test 02 discussion[edit]

Is the rule on doing it tomorrow absolutely necessary? Can we revert the vandalism using STiki? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can start today! You can use any tool, script! --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any quick way to generate the diff template? I am finding it very hectic to copy revision ids from url to make the reqd template. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And do I have to take my latest 20 reverts or do I get to choose them? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

20 reverts from the time of question. You can not choose reverts (so that you include only the reverts with best edit summaries and reports)! --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:18, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does the vandalism tag placed during the test have to be same as the initial tag placed while reverting [I did self-revert atleast one tag after realising it was incorrect] TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification - In edit 13, I intended to add the edit summary but used the rollback button without realising that rollback does not allow the option for edit summaries.

Question - In Q14 and Q16, my answers were marked as wrong. Is it normal for any reverting editor to check the user's talk page/contribution history before marking as AGF or Vandalism? Or was that to be taken into consideration only because here we had to specify whether it was vandalism or not? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Test 03 discussion[edit]

I think i shall just continue with editing. Am quite filled with projects and presentations and essays to make already. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I take it that this is the last test right? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! Yes! --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]