User talk:Tluangacylo

Welcome!

Hello, Tluangacylo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 07:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Habana Lab moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Habana Lab, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions for the Arab-Israeli dispute area

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.

3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Your edit at Ein Gev is an example of the sort of edit you should not be making. If in doubt, don't. Always read the top of talk pages. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What in the world was "Founder and Commander of David Mighty Warrior" about?

I've no idea what you were thinking of when you did this and would like to know. Doug Weller talk 07:04, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Iron Beam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 08:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot add claims about something that is said in 2020 and source it to a 2016 reference. Meters (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arrow 3, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bump to level 2. What are you doing? First you make an unsourced claim that it goes Mach 12+, and when no-one challenges that you come back and change it to Mach 20+ Meters (talk) 08:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And on Spike (missile). The cited source clearly says "25 km" for the range of the Spike NLOS, not the 32 km you changed it to. If you have more recent sources then use them, other wise do not change these. Meters (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters as you may have noticed, I am already concerned about this editor. Thanks for the warnings above. Doug Weller talk 08:59, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I'm the one that undid the strange edit to David earlier today, and I just undid another yet unsourced claim about an Israeli weapons system (Sea Breaker (missile)). The user has been making these unsourced changes for six weeks, and unfortunately no-one has said anything until now, and I don't think any of the edits were undone.until now. Meters (talk) 09:09, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters we'll see if this continues. Doug Weller talk 14:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Outline of Israel, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Iron Beam. Meters (talk) 05:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inability to follow our policies and guidelines after multiple warnings.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Habana Lab

Hello, Tluangacylo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Habana Lab, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Habana Lab

Hello, Tluangacylo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Habana Lab".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]