User talk:Tmac9986

Broadcast journalism

Hey there. That piece is looking quite good at this point - informative and pretty well written. I think one key point that I'd bring up is the need for inline citations and some more sources to outline the points you're making. I'm sure there's lots of resources that can be used for that. Nice work so far! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for considering me to look over your article. I briefly proofed it and don't see anything of concern right now. I agree with Mr. Tony Fox above about inline citations. I did discover that "Broadcast Journalism" (both words capitalized) redirected to the main "Journalism" article instead of Broadcast journalism, and I changed it; the redirect existed before this article. Salamurai (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I'm sorry it took so long to get back to you. The article you've asked me about looks good, the only suggestion I have is to add some footnotes so that it is clearer where the references apply. This template adds footnotes to an article, usually they go at the end of an assertion: <ref>{{cite book|last=|first=|title=|publisher=|date=|isbn=}}</ref>. For an example of a formatted footnote referencing a real book: <ref name=Porkert1974>{{cite book|last=Porkert |first=Manfred|title=The Theoretical Foundations of Chinese Medicine: Systems of Correspondence|publisher=MIT Press |date=1974|isbn=0262160587}}</ref>. To get the footnote to show in the references section add {{reflist}} in the references section. If you have any questions, let me know. Cheers! --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for thinking of me to work on this article. I've been on the radio for over 24 years. So far, I've re-written the introduction in my usual way, which I hope you like. Korky Day (talk) 22:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alliant Energy Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alliant Energy Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]