User talk:Tofaan

Archives

Archive September 2010 - 19 June 2011

Ghurids

Iranians were to the rise of Safavids to 90% Sunnis. --188.107.15.203 (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hahhaah, The Caliphate was broken because of the war between Shia and Sunni and look around the world, Persia was only place the people were Shia! Study a little bit before editing please.Tofaan (talk) 15:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:28, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. i have already than reversion it 3 times. So, can you please than revert it? Thanks in advanceTofaan (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

You have been reported for edit-warring.[1] --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is a sockpuppet ... and already banned many times from 2007 till today. One of his name was NisarKand. --188.107.8.226 (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

any prove? let the admins do resource for you Lysozym, i know it's you, in which flat are you living? everytime you steal IP-address from someone else. But it doesn't means that i don't know you and except from this i set from now on the faith of Kansas Bear also on doubt.Tofaan (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at "Ghurid Dynasty", take 3

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Ghurid Dynasty. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Larry V (talk | email) 23:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listen. You CANNOT continue edit warring any time anyone makes any changes that you disagree with. If talk page discussions fail to resolve an issue, there are many, many channels for soliciting outside opinion and mediation. Yet to my knowledge you haven't pursued any of them, despite myriad discussions and warnings, as well as two prior blocks. (No, WP:ANI is not dispute resolution.) It doesn't matter how right you think you are, this behavior is absolutely unacceptable. Cut it out, and read this while you're at it. Larry V (talk | email) 23:03, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also this: Wikipedia:Civility. Larry V (talk | email) 03:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]