Jump to content

User talk: Tom.Reding

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has template editor rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is a WikiGnome.
This user has AutoWikiBrowser permissions on the English Wikipedia.
Bot operator top icon
This user uses HotCat to work with categories.
Trout this user
This user is a WikiSloth.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This...should...do it!

Barnstar[edit]

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation, January 21, 2012.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Technical Barnstar
Congratulations, Tom.Reding, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you for all the great DAB work you've been doing recently, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep it up! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:17, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your incredible WikiGnoming over the past few months. I am in awe. A2soup (talk) 23:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :)   ~ Tom.Reding & his 200-some-odd lines of regex (talkcontribsdgaf)  02:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You have nearly single-handedly eliminated the minor planet notability problem, which had stood for seven years before you decided to tackle it, because nobody wanted to do the massive amount of work required. If this doesn't deserve a barnstar, I'm not sure what does. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For dealing with the minor planet clusterfuck as efficiently as you have! Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 04:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing quite like cleaning up a good, 'ol-fashioned clusterfuck. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  04:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, this isn't just for the recent banner tagging, but for the shear amount of effort involved in cleaning up the mess for the past year or so. Possibly longer. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Technical Barnstar
thanks for helping me with the search codes! Jennica / talk 20:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar awarded[edit]

The Redirect Barnstar
Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! On behalf of your fellow editors—and the millions of readers of our work—I sincerely thank you for your contributions that have improved the encyclopedia for everyone. Senator2029 “Talk” 08:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you very much for helping and editing the Joe Campos Torres article, your assistance put a BIG SMILE on my face!
Vwanweb (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure; that was a satisfying edit :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:56, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you![edit]

The Bio-star
In recognition of your recent contributions to the Life Sciences on en:Wikipedia, analyzing and helping to improve the quality of articles, based on scientific data. Your efforts demonstrate tremendous potential into enhancing the scientific accuracy of The Free Encyclopedia.

I am tremendously appreciative of your efforts, especially on the preliminary Taxonomic analysis.

~ Mellis (talk) 23:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week[edit]

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your constant positive demeanor. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I am always on the lookout for potential Editor of the Week candidates, for editors that fly under the radar, whose efforts are unknown except to a few. They don't make a splash, they don't emit a 'notice me' kind of behavior; they just quietly tackle the hard jobs. Tom.Reding is that kind of editor. A while back he "thanked me" via the Thanks Notification for awarding the Editor of the Week to a fellow editor. So, I looked into him and found an editor that does many important WP improving things. He is a working editor (535,847 live and undeleted edits) that fixes, populates, corrects, standardizes, cleans, parses, tries, peruses, adds, formats, listens, expands, updates, corrects, creates, assigns and (my favorite) "consistifies". A member of Wikiproject Astronomy and Wikiproject Tree of Life, he has recently been granted the page mover user right. He provides a human eye and understanding to "bot" problems that arise. In the area of redirect categorization he willingly puts his head together with other editors to work toward solution. A deserving recipient.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Project Med Foundation
Tom.Reding
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning January 28, 2018
Quietly tackles the hard jobs. 536000 live and undeleted edits. A page mover. Understands "bot" problems. A deserving recipient.
Recognized for
work in redirect categorization
Notable work(s)
Wikiproject Astronomy and Wikiproject Tree of Life
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7  20:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

! XD <3 TY!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The AWB Barnster[edit]

The AWB Barnster
Fixing many depreciated syntax on infobox images. Iggy (Swan) 22:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Olympic Barnstar
For your excellent work in getting the bot up and running to tag biographies for the Olympic Wiki Project. Thank you! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:00, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, my pleasure :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  12:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on joining the million edit club![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Congratulations on being the seventh editor on the English Wikipedia to do over a million non-bot edits! ϢereSpielChequers 12:14, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I never thought I'd do so much, but I just keep finding things to fix/improve :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  13:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Space Barnstar
For your astronomic contributions! For taking up so much space!

With apologies for the puns, Ira Leviton (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you![edit]

7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 16:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have used your gifts well, Padawan[edit]

Bringing order out of chaos
OCD. It's not an affliction. It is a gift, and is part of the job description for being a Wikipedia editor. See WP:wikiholic.

"Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering."

Takes one to know one. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen () 16:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen, thank you :) And I really should take the test, but I can't be bothered while editing...perhaps that is or should be one of the questions??   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Jobe well done when it comes to the article on Prof. Helmut Veith (1971-2016). Terrenus (talk) 14:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2019 Cure Award
In 2019 you were one of the top ~300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a thematic organization whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for your efforts[edit]

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
:)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  15:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Bot Creator Barnstar
For putting your OCD to good use when you created Tom.Bot. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see we both have OCD. I had no choice but to give you this barnstar. Scorpions13256 (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, comrade.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  04:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
thank you for all your help here. Paulhus15 (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Just a barnstar for you!

Your userboxes were fascinating and you seem like a really interesting person. I also somehow see you on every page I edit.

Thanks for the contributions you have made! Hhzhang2345 Hhzhang2345 (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for helping edit Wikipedia and make the encyclopedia a better place for others. Thank you and keep up the good work. --ThanosYourGod (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks a lot for adding authority control to so many articles Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For improving Navseasoncats[edit]

What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
…or rather, what a succession of brilliant improvements you have made to {{Navseasoncats}}! – Fayenatic London 19:58, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2024[edit]



Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy New Year

2024

Thank you for your support on ANI (while I slept). As you know, I have a DYK on the Main page, but my story would be different, about Figaro, - this Figaro. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tom,

It is very tricky to move categories which is why most CFD discussions end with bots moving categories around and recategorizing articles and subcategories. If you do move a category page, please make sure that all of the contents of the old category are recategoized so that they are in the category with the new page title. Many thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, forgot to do that...   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  22:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barn![edit]

The Working Man's Barnstar
For your tireless work in repetitive and laborious tasks. Cheers! Thinker78 (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, on WikiProject-specific templates, we use {{WikiProject Articles for creation (admin)}} to avoid errors. Primefac (talk) 12:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 All similar creations fixed!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  12:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Current events portals project tagging[edit]

I've noticed you've been creating the talk pages of subpages of the current events portals. I really don't see the need in project tagging all of these especially when there is no need to do so. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: regardless, they were being tagged haphazardly. Now it will be much more obvious how to do so if/when someone wishes to do so in the future. I originally brought it up @ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Current events#Historical portal talk tagging.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  13:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Space Barnstar
I just wanted to say "thank you" for picking up the torch of updating the list of minor planets! (And I hope Rfassbind is doing fine too off WP!) Double sharp (talk) 08:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Double sharp! (and thanks for the reminder for the latest big batch :)   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  12:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you :) Nwebbvillegas (talk) 17:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Igal Ahouvi[edit]

  ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  19:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject banner shell[edit]

Hello. May I ask why you are mass-adding WikiProject banner shells to file talk pages such as this one? In the RfCs discussing the redesign of the banner shell and the deprecation of project-independent quality assessments, there was only community consensus to perform those two tasks, not to mass-add WikiProject banner shells to talk pages, and especially not on talk pages where it would produce no effect (file talk pages are automatically classified as file- or NA-class, so your edits are tantamount to cosmetic edits). I am sure you are well aware that bot-like editing that does nothing except spam editors' watchlists is considered disruptive. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@InfiniteNexus: I was under the impression that {{WPBS}} be used ubiquitously, but I could be wrong. Adding the shell removes Category:WikiProject banners without banner shells, so it is not a cosmetic edit.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would request that the category be adjusted to remove file, template, and category talk pages, where quality assessment is automatic and WPBS serves no purpose. Pinging @MSGJ. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix AWB edits that are removing table end markup[edit]

See this edit for an example. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done it looks like you caught the only 2!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  14:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Careful with what you change[edit]

In Special:Diff/1213365807, you changed {{oldpuffull}} to {{oldffdfull}}. This means that the link goes to the wrong discussion page. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed all 5 instances. Thanks for finding that.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  17:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you help me give it a linguistic and cleaning review as the user mentioned to me who is suggesting to link it to other articles that it is not very clear to me how to do it. thank you --Acartonadooopo (talk) 21:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Acartonadooopo: I ran my cleanup settings over it, and the page looks ok layout-wise. I've no interest in doing much more than that. You appear to know how to link to other articles, since you have done so in this section's heading.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  22:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, for the cleanliness, how to remove this template since that template is not at all clear to me, according to the user, I have a connection with the singer, I don't see where else, translating an article from Hebrew to English does not make me familiar at all to the singing person What happened volume for the elimination of that template Acartonadooopo (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Acartonadooopo: please discuss your COI (or lack thereof) at User talk:Acartonadooopo#Managing COI.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  23:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a task that you might be interested in[edit]

We recently changed the title structure for TV seasons to exclude parenthesis (e.g., Loki season 1 rather than Loki (season 1). I have a list of about 500 categories that need to be renamed to follow the article titles, which will require several thousand edits to recategorize all of the episodes listed in those categories. This could be done by a bot, but I tend to prefer more hands-on supervision. If you take this up, please remove completed categories from the list as you go. Cheers! BD2412 T 17:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Helped & now done!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  14:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of WikiProject American football[edit]

Tom, per your edits at Template talk:1967 West Penn Conference football standings, and many analogous ones, articles and templates and the like that apply specifically to American college football or American junior college football are not within the scope of WikiProject American football. The scope of WP American football includes general topics related to the sport and only specific team, league, player, and coach articles are do not fall under the scope of a more specific American football-related WikiProject like WikiProject College football or WikiProject National Football League. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed, thank you!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  14:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Koziba[edit]

Hello! My name is Laurie Koziba, I have been researching my last name for a long while. I have been trying to make contact with writers with no luck. I thank you for this update. Email laurie 173.189.199.234 (talk) 20:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Congratulations on becoming the fourth-ranked editor by number of edits. I know exactly how difficult that is! BD2412 T 15:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ras Al Khaimah[edit]

Hi Tom

I reverted a number of changes you made from Ras Al Khaimah to Ras al-Khaimah using AWB. Ras Al Khaimah is the spelling of the WP article, the currently used spelling and the locally used spelling. I haven't changed the template, but it really should be changed too. The al-Khaimah spelling is antiquated. Happy to chat if this raises any questions! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - {{WikiProject Western Asia}} updated & CSDs filed.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  13:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ta! :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for cleaning up category talk pages. Looking at Special:Diff/1219087395 and related, I don't think {{WikiProject Years}} would belong per my discussion here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Is any page with a year in its title within the scope of this WP?. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see...   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  18:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion nomination for Category:American politicians who are the sole member of their party in statewide office[edit]

Hello Tom,

I saw that you recently edited the WikiProject box for Category:American politicians who are the most recent member of their party to hold statewide office. I created another category, Category:American politicians who are the sole member of their party in statewide office. It has been nominated for deletion here. I find their arguments incredibly ill-conceived - one voter glibly suggested it was as useful as a category for politicians who like eating chips. All who have voted thus far have not substantively responded to my rebuttals.

Since you clearly find value in a very similar category, is there any chance you and perhaps others from WP Biography could please vote Keep on the discussion? You might well see them as distinct for whatever reason... The prominent/accomplished administrator who nominated it thinks categories shouldn't be "temporary." Of course Wikipedia is updated to reflect current events like elections, and he has been unable to point to a formal rule requiring categories to be permanently applicable to biographies (i.e. not subject to regularly scheduled changes of employment). Still, he is undoubtedly respected on here. In that case I will of course respect your opinion too, but it was worth a shot!

Thank you very much for your consideration. 1Matt20 (talk) 16:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk pages[edit]

Hello, Tom.Reding,

Please do not make category talk pages for categories that the CFD bot has moved. It usually doesn't leave a redirect so there is no category page and these category talk pages just get speedy deleted as orphaned talk pages. I've run into this over a dozen times now with your use of AWB. I'm not sure where you are getting a list of category talk pages to create but it is obviously not up-to-date. I realize there has been a system lag over the past two days so perhaps that is part of the problem. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, you created a talk page for the maintenance category, Category talk:Proposed deletion as of 10 April 2024, which was deleted as soon as it was emptied prior to you creating a talk page! And still you created a talk page even though there are never discussions on the talk pages of maintenance categories which is why they rarely are created. Please, do not randomly create talk pages through AWB for categories that have already been deleted, it just creates work for admins who must them delete them. I'm not sure in what other ways I can get this message across to you. You are responsible for all of your edits, including those with AWB so do not make any unnecessary page creations. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: yes, I created it accidentally and quickly blanked it. I checked for and excluded deleted cats yesterday, and again today after your first message. I'll be more stringent in the future by excluding cats with CSD/CFD tags on them, which should solve the problem.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  02:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But you just did it again with Category talk:Auburn, Alabama municipal elections! Liz Read! Talk! 16:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: this morning, before Category:Auburn, Alabama municipal elections was deleted, I excluded all cats that either didn't exist, or contained <!--\s*BEGIN. For good measure, I also excluded all cat talks that contain <!--\s*BEGIN, but clearly a different check is needed. What text did Category:Auburn, Alabama municipal elections contain prior to deletion? Does the CxD text get removed prior to deletion, or does it remain on the page until the page is deleted?   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk pages WP Cities[edit]

Hello, yesterday you added WP Cities to 16 categories of Ukrainian football clubs, player, manager and staff categories. Those categories do not fall under Cities WP. I will revert those additions. Wanted to give an explanation before you are notified of reverts.Ceriy (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ceriy: if it's the FC of a city, then I believe the cat falls under {{WP Cities}}, since it's something directly related to that city and may be used to improve the city article.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  12:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported parameter "Frankfurt" in WikiProject Germany[edit]

Hi, {{WikiProject Germany}} no longer supports a "Frankfurt" parameter, as Wikipedia:WikiProject Frankfurt has been marked as inactive for a while. Articles with that unsupported parameter will appear in Category:Pages using WikiProject Germany with unknown parameters, which I am monitoring to keep empty. I've removed the instruction on Wikipedia:WikiProject Frankfurt relating to the parameter (in case that instruction was what you were following). Harryboyles 00:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Harryboyles: so it is, thank you! Actually, I added the parameter several months ago, when I started getting into WikiProject tagging, using the instructions at {{WP Germany}}. I noticed a few weeks ago that there are a good # of unupdated /docs after a mass parameter culling mid-to-late last year (before my tagging efforts started), so I've been working on getting closer to parity (via template code) since then.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  01:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add WikiProject Architecture on Category:Fire Emblem: Three Houses characters. It really does not fit at all. Fire Emblem: Three Houses is a video game that has little to do with architecture. If it was a bot edit that was searching for categories with the word "house", I understand. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File talk page categories/shells[edit]

Hi Tom — is there a particular reason that you are adding project banner shells to talk pages of files in only a single category, e.g. here? Is there consensus to do this at scale? If so, it would be much preferable for such work to be done by bot to reduce watchlist clutter and increase accountability. Sdkbtalk 16:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb: I'm just doing a little each day to minimize watchlist clutter. Even bots received watchlist complaints during the PIQA implementation due to the large # of pages they were editing and their speed, so I can understand why they're not operating on this low-priority task.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That does not answer my first two questions. And, 2.4 million edits into your wiki career, you should understand which tasks are appropriate to do by bot. This is absolutely one of them. Please file a BRFA if you wish to proceed with it. Sdkbtalk 16:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym and Kanashimi: are yall planning to run on these pages and a lot more in Category:WikiProject banners without banner shells (973,612) at some point?   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I was ready to handle file namespace before. Now, you can just add the file namespace to option "PIQA_namespace" on the settings page, and the robot will handle it the next time. Kanashimi (talk) 00:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cities & Ubachsberg[edit]

Why did you add WikiProject Cities to Talk:Ubachsberg? The article is already part of WikiProject Villages. A place can imho not be a village and a city at the same time. The Banner talk 13:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: because {{WP Villages}} is defunct, and Ubachsberg meets Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities#Scope.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  13:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that sounds reasonable. The Banner talk 14:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bot account[edit]

Could you please create a bot account to fulfill edits like done with Estonian villages, et Talk:Valgevälja. You probably achieve some kind of contributions record, but please think about other users as well whose watchlists are extremely populated after your bot-like edits--Estopedist1 (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tom I've just seen that in that list 2 items were missing: 686067 & 686068. I have added only the data I need for my translation into Italian. Please verify and complete with all other values

Thanks YukioSanjo (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@YukioSanjo: interesting... The MPC apparently omitted the discovery site for those lines and a few others. I'll account for this and have another run-through soon. Thanks for finding!   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  10:25, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk header[edit]

Hi! You seem to be going round removing {{Talk header}} from talk-pages, but without giving any reason for doing so. Is there some discussion of this somewhere? If so, would you kindly link to it in your edit summary? And if there's consensus to remove it from the project, isn't that a task that'd be much better done by a bot (to reduce watchlist clutter, as usual)? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing {{Talk header}} per its own documentation @ Template:Talk header#Should this be added to every talk page?: This template should be placed in accordance with talk page guidelines. This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages using automated editing tools. Talk pages that are frequently misused, that attract frequent debate, articles often subject to controversy, articles that typically attract new editors, and highly-visible or popular topics may be appropriate for this template., so I don't see why it should stay on Template talk:Donkey breeds of Spain and Portugal, Template talk:Chicken breeds of Japan, etc. I'll add that link to the summary to be more obvious. I'm not simply removing the template, but doing a large amount of additional cleanup and standardization which requires supervision, so I'll slow down for watchlists' sake.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  21:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk header and archives[edit]

Is there future intent to go around and add the archive template to pages that have archives and the talk header has been removed? Moxy🍁 17:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moxy: do you have an example? I've been avoiding talks with any mention of archive. I'll go back and look for any archive subpages, just in case.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  18:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good.... I see you got it! Moxy🍁 19:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]