User talk:Tom63552
July 2022
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States was changed by Tom63552 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872107 on 2022-07-23T10:58:59+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring warning
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Vox (political party) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I'll repeat, please educate yourself on WP:CON, WP:NPOV, WP:BRD; then revert your disruptive edits of the article, and feel free to discuss in the article talk page, why do you think a particular source you bring forward justifies removing other sources and different point-of-view, and how does it fit into WP:NPOV policy. Otherwise, we'll have to ask administrators to apply sanctions to your account and protect the article from further disruption from you. Birdofpreyru (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Birdofpreyru (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2022 (UTC)