User talk:TomZiemba
Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Legal nurse consultant. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. The NYT article does not say that she "created the profession", and continuing to add her name to the article is spamming. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- I've read the article, and again, it doesn't say what your sentence says. Also, listing all of her degrees in the article sure makes it seem like promotion for her. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Edit Request: Please remove the sentence in Legal nurse consultant that says, "It has been claimed that Vickie Milazzo pioneered the field." This statment, in my opinion, is an advertisement for a private organization and should be removed in order to make this artcle neutral, fair, and unbiased. There are other organizations that have contributed greatly to the field of Legal Nurse Consulting as well. Additionally, since you are an an employee of Vickie Milazzo's organization, I beleive that also makes it a conflict of interest. Rsanch {18:06, 11 May 2012 (UTC)}
Hello! I volunteer my time over at the conflict of interest noticeboard and a user has reported than you may have a conflict of interest with an article you are editing. Rather than speculate, I thought I'd come here and ask you to comment in the discussion and clarify what your connection to Legal nurse consultant and Vickie Milazzo. The discussion can be found here. OlYeller21Talktome 21:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- @TomZiemba: The article from the NY Times that you have been using as a reference includes the information that "Thomas M. Ziemba" is the husband of Vickie Milazzo. This raises the serious question of whether you have a conflict of interest regarding the article Legal nurse consultant, since the information you have been trying over the past few months to insert in the article regards Vickie Milazza. I urge you to read the Wikipedia policy on conflicts of interest and to edit in accord with the recommendations there.
I also note that you have not responded to any of the various requests on this talk page to engage you in discussion concerning these matters. Please know that Wikipedia is conceived as being a collegial project, and that failure to engage in discussion can result in your being blocked from editing in the future. It would be best if you respond to the concerns that have been raised here, and do not continue to simply re-insert the information in various forms without discussing the issues first. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
AN/I[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding unwillingness to resolve a dispute. The thread is Legal Nurse Consultant. Thank you. —Rsanch (talk) 03:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit]
Please note that "vandalism" has a specific meaning on Wikipedia - please read WP:Vandalism. Calling another editor's contribution "vandalism" when it is not is not allowed, and continuing to do so can get you blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
It has come to my attention that it's possible that both you and User:Rsanch, who are involved in an editing dispute on this article, might have a conflict of interest in regard to this subject, and may be employees of rival LNC firms. Due to WP:OUTING concerns, I am not going to attempt to confirm this information, but because of its plausibility, I am warning both of you not to continue to revert each other, not to attempt to skew the article in favor of any one company, and to follow the suggestions in WP:COI about editing the article.
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for the promotion of any commercial enterprise, and, as a privately owned website, is not subject to commercial freedom of speech. Editors are not allowed to advertise or promote their companies here, and continuing to do so in the face of warnings to stop can lead to being blocked from future editing. Please read WP:COI carefully, and follow the suggestions there about how editors with a conflict of interest should edit articles they have a connection to. Any future edits you make directly to this article will be subject to immediate reversion. Thank you. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)