Jump to content

User talk:Tom Stourton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Tom Stourton. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Tom Stourton, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tom Stourton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Stourton. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tom Stourton (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am Tom Stourton and I am simply trying to correct my own page with the correct date and place of birth: 28th September 1987 Washington DC, USA

Decline reason:

This does not address your use of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tom Stourton (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I truly have not, to the best of my knowledge, used multiple accounts. I am Tom Stourton, and I would like to have my correct date of birth 28 September 1987 stated. And I would like to be unblocked. PleaseTom Stourton (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to query below in six days. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you have nothing to do with the Msc2008 account, whose only edits have been to the article about you and occurred nineteen minutes after your editing attempts? 331dot (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]