User talk:Tomkraft.at

Sorry, but usernames that match a URL are considered promotional and are not allowed

This account with this username has been blocked indefinitely because the username may be rude or inflammatory, be unnecessarily long or confusing, be too similar to an existing user, contain the name of an organization or website, refer to a Wikipedia or Wikimedia Foundation process or namespace, or be otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username.

Alternately, you may request a change in username if you want to keep the contributions from this account. To do so, please follow these directions:

1. Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page.
2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked.
3. You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request before you may be re-blocked. Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use; do not create the new account then request a name change. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.

In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is much easier to create a new account. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Sandstein (talk) 10:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tomkraft.at! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Muriel Houtteman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muriel Houtteman

The article Muriel Houtteman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreffed BLP with libelous accusations. No reliable sources can be found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 11:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

It is not really important and Muriel Houtteman is not an affair of the heart for me, but I think a bbc-article is somethink like a reliable source.

Muriel Houtteman

Muriel Houtteman (born May 7, 1972 in Ixelles, Belgium), also known as Fili (or Fily) (Mol-)Houteman, is a former belgian Stripper who had a love affaire with Daniel Ducruet which led to his divorce from Princess Stéphanie of Monaco. Contents

   * 1 The Affaire „Ducruet“
   * 2 The Trial
   * 3 After the Affaire
   * 4 External links

The Affaire „Ducruet“

Houtteman was reigning „Miss Nude Belgium“ when in August 1996 Belgian photographer Stephane de Lisiecki arranged a meeting between Houtteman and Princess Stephanie's husband Daniel Ducruet in a rented villa in Villefranche-sur-Mer, Southern France. De Lisiecki and Houtteman's boyfriend Yves Hoogewys photographed Ducruet having poolside sex with Houtteman. The pictures and a video footage of the tryst were widely reproduced in the Spanish, Italian and German press and led directly to the royal couple's divorce. Houtteman used her short time popularity for several performances in TV and magazines, such as Eurotrash or Penthouse.

The Trial

In 2000 the magistrates' court in Nice found Houtteman, de Lisiecki and Hoogewys guilty of breaching the intimacy of Ducruet's private life. Houteman and Hoogewys were given six-month suspended prison sentences, de Lisiecki was given a one-year suspended sentence. Ducruet was given compensation of 200.000 French Francs.

After the Affaire

In 2003 Houtteman published her biography Profession strip-teaseuse : Les dessous du métier (Edition Michel Lafon). In 2004 she was on the cover of a Belgian men's magazine entiteled: 7 years after Monaco. She was then working as gym teacher in a Brussel's sports club.

External links

   * BBC-News - Monaco sex trap stripper sentenced