User talk:Tommieboi

Welcome!

Hello, Tommieboi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Guinnog 23:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Most Senior Reps

Representative	Date of Birth	Tenure in Office	State	Political Party	Age (Years/Days)
Merwin Coad	September 28, 1924	1957-1962	Iowa	Democrat	100 years, 42 days
Lucien Nedzi	May 28, 1925	1961-1981	Michigan	Democrat	99 years, 165 days
Alec G. Olson	September 11, 1930	1963-1967	Minnesota	Minnesota DFLP	94 years, 59 days
Don Fuqua	August 20, 1933	1963-1987	Florida	Democrat	91 years, 81 days
William J. Green, III	June 24, 1938	1964-1973	Pennsylvania	Democrat	86 years, 138 days
Richard Ottinger	January 27, 1929	1965-1985	New York	Democrat	95 years, 287 days
Lee H. Hamilton	April 20, 1931	1965-1999	Indiana	Democrat	93 years, 203 days

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hard work in researching and adding birth and death dates for individuals! Cheers, CP 16:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death dates/cites

Hey. Thanks for your work in finding death dates/cites around Wikipedia. One thing - can you try and include a mention of death in the prose of the article with the accompanying citation when you do this, or add the cite at the end of the first sentence in the lead section of the article? Cites in the lifespan brackets contribute to a cluttered appearance of the lede sentence and they are better suited to back up statements in the article. Thanks. Connormah (talk) 07:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing - per WP:MOSDASH, an endash should be used for date ranges. Thanks again. Connormah (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths

Hello, and thank you for the work you're doing adding dates of death. It's good to see someone adding cites for this sort of thing, and filling in most of the relevant things that need changing. There are a couple more things that ought to change when a person is known to have died: one is the bit in the opening sentence that says "is a former footballer" or whatever should be changed to "was a footballer", and the other is on the article talk page, if you have the time, to change "living=yes" to "living=no". Keep up the good work, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Tommie may have found what happend to Mona Friedlander but dunno how reliable it is as it's not really an obituary. https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp54889/mona-renee-ve-forward-nee-friedlander --ThatBaileyLad (talk) 13:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You! Very Much!! --Tommieboi (talk) 00:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tommie Codebreaker Betty Webb (code breaker) is still living. --ThatBaileyLad (talk) 22:03, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of genealogy at WikiConference North America this weekend

I thought I'd give a lightning talk at this weekend's Meta:WikiConference North America/2020 about how we use WikiTree+ to compare ancestor profiles on WikiTree to Wikidata to find errors. It's Friday at 17:00 EST. I'm Lowe-866 on WikiTree. KarenJoyce (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kay Bullitt

On 28 August 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kay Bullitt, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 09:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert W. Porter (neurosurgeon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tamar Eshel died

Hi. Just saw that Tamar Eshel died today, her 102nd birthday. Atbannett (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tommieboi (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and Thank You, Tommieboi!

Hello Tommieboi,

I just arrived on Wiki not long ago and came across Rev. Gilbert B. Rego stub! What a delight!

First of all, I'd like to congratulate you on your achievement - The Original Barnstar award! Now, I find that after more then a decade you would be retiring in 2023. I hope I'm not too late to say a big "Thanks" for your contributions.

On bishop Rego, I would definitely love to expand on that article, knowing him so well as our bishop emeritus. Awesome that you would put his name here on Wiki!

My very best to you and yours! Take good care, enjoy life, good health and blessings!

Setwikirec0 (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of José María Montes

The article José María Montes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 15:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paulino Reale Chirina

The article Paulino Reale Chirina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 15:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucas Luis Dónnelly

The article Lucas Luis Dónnelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 15:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]