User talk:Tomwood0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Tomwood0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Terence Ong 05:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation Newsletter delivery[edit]

The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amendment to Missy Higgins article[edit]

The amendment made to the Missy Higgins article did not remove material without good reason. The material is more appropriate at the end of the article where it is already duplicated. It also wrongly describes "Steer" as the title track of the album. The sentence about release dates does not make grammatical sense. I'll leave it if it makes you happy to have such badly written material in the article, others may not be so generous Keithmall 11:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I am genuinely sorry if the tone of my comments seemed uncivilised but your own comments ie "please do not remove material without good reason" were also a bit abrasive considering we now agree that my amendments were made for a reason. Clearly we are are both interested in the quality of the article and of Wikipedia in general so maybe we should shake hands from (presumably)several thousand miles apart and work for the common good. I think the compromise amendments that have been made are absolutely fine. He is quite correct that this is an encyclopedia not a fan information site. I think the "headline" reference to a 2nd album (which I guess we are both looking forward to hearing), with fuller details in their chronological place is a correct approach to the structure of the article. We have both apologised for our comments and I am pleased this has come to a grown up conclusion. Keithmall 17:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canterbury and Monomeath Avenue[edit]

When I reverted back, it wasn't a straight revert, as a check of the diff will show (March to my last edit) - I tried to incorporate as much as possible of what you had added, including the history of Monomeath Avenue and the list format of residents, which I preferred to the earlier paragraph style. I even included some of the descriptive language.

However, some of the reversions are a tad odd - firstly I checked the domain.com.au listing today, hence why I updated the date. Secondly I unlinked the schools as there is a general consensus on Wikipedia as to what constitutes notability in order that a school can have an article. Thirdly, re "village charm", I'd point you to some comments I made elsewhere about such terms in articles (to avoid repeating myself here) - also see weasel words. Same applies to "coveted" - who covets? where can this be verified? Finally, "most notable residential address", "an Australian icon", "prestigious street", "retains its full glory" - again, can't be verified and is POV (these would look quite comfortable in a tourist brochure, but not in an encyclopaedia). The stuff about Anthony Podesta's mansion is basically unverifiable.

This is what I was referring to in my initial comments - certainly nothing against the article being added to in an encyclopaedic way and many of your contribs have been useful in improving/upgrading the article. Orderinchaos 12:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aside re pics[edit]

Pretty impressed with the photography :) I'd strongly recommend you upload them (preferably under the same names as what you have here) to Wikipedia Commons at http://commons.wikipedia.org - if you set up an account there, you can upload them the same way you do here. If you do that, make sure you put [[Category:Canterbury, Victoria]] in the information box after the }}. Main reason for this is if the article gets translated into another language then they can use the pics as well. Orderinchaos 13:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the friendly attitude you showed. I'm sorry I didn't analyze the article enough and made a fast-minded decision to revert it as I thought as my section ==Monomeath Avenue== was taken out, but was merely reorganized and edited. Only one little thing I want to add is a comment adding that Monommeath is a notable street in the Melbournian community (many tourists buses go down it and it's name is synonymous with wealth, prestige etc.)I give you permission to upload my fabulous pictures onto commons and re-link to them from Canterbury's page and delete the ones on wiki. Tom 03:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. BTW the tourist buses bit could definitely be included as it's verifiable - case of, you can say the what without explaining the why, and leave readers to deduce that tourist buses would only visit it because it's a notable street (as further illustrated by the list of residents further down the page). Orderinchaos 05:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Airlines fleet up for discussion[edit]

As an editor who has participated on the Singapore Airlines fleet talk page, this is a friendly notice to advise you that the Singapore Airlines fleet article has been nominated for discussion and review. If you would like to provide your opinion, refer to the discussion page. This notice is being provided for all editors who have participated on the article talk page. --Russavia 05:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tony Jones.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tony Jones.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

News[edit]

I am not a fan of the infobox. It clutters up the page unnecessarily, when the info is already mentioned in the article. Alltrainzfan (talk) 10:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seven news page[edit]

You're cluttering the page with useless information which is already mentioned further in the article. Otherwise the article may as well be shortened to become a quick view, then to another page for any user.TrainingRule (talk) 10:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved![edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 05:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LeisureJet for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article LeisureJet, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeisureJet until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Replaceable fair use File:Tony Jones.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tony Jones.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 17:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cancellation of The FBI Files[edit]

I do not believe this is important here, and I agree with your change, but, in general, saying a program was "cancelled after its final episode" can mean something: specifically the writers didn't know the show was ending so story arcs are not completed, loose ends are not tied up, etc. Mark Hurd (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mark. I understand your point but to a reasonable reader I'm sure "cancelled after its final episode" would sound silly as by being cancelled a show must have a 'final episode' - rather than distinguishing it from being cancelled after an episode which wasn't intended to be final (but technically would still become it, wouldn't it?). I believe to be clear and proper these two points should be kept more separate. Tom W (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When duplicating references[edit]

Hello, Tomwood0. I saw your addition to the Bisexuality article and your tweak soon after it, and I decided to let you know why I tweaked the duplication of the reference you included just in case you don't check back and see my edit summary in the edit history. When duplicating references, you don't have to duplicate the entire reference; this is explained at Wikipedia:NAMEDREFS#Multiple references to the same footnote.

Anyway, thanks for the addition and take care. Flyer22 (talk) 21:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pursuing this Flyer22, as it actually made me realize I'd accidentally put the wrong reference there! All fixed now :) Tom W (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, you're welcome. And thank you again. Flyer22 (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I kind of wondered what was meant by "A further study," but I figured that the source you included covers it. But, like you stated, now I know. Flyer22 (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samsung Galaxy S II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

A gummi bear holding a sign that says "Thank you"
Thank you for using VisualEditor and sharing your ideas with the developers.

Hello, Tomwood0,

The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too. 

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tomwood0. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tomwood0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne meetup[edit]

A quick note: There is a meetup in Fed Square this Sunday at 6pm. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 00:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tomwood0. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022[edit]

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,771 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tomwood0&oldid=1143395544"