User talk:TooLebby

Referencing

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia I am Paulpat99 (talk), Thank you for your edits to Draft:Deji Olatunji. But can you please look at this page here Help:Referencing for beginners before adding more references. Thanks Paulpat99 (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, TooLebby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Draft:Deji Olatunji. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Paulpat99 (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deji Olatunji (January 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deji (Youtuber), Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 November 15#Deji (YouTuber) (with list of many other titles) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oladeji Olatunji...

bonadea contributions talk 20:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TooLebby! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 20:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Hello TooLebby. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TooLebby. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TooLebby|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 20:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. TooLebby (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please can you include your reasoning for declining Draft:Deji Olatunji TooLebby (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

The reason is provided on the draft and in numerous prior deletion discussions regarding this unremarkable "YouTuber". I'm not sure how you came to edit about him, but you will have to move to another topic, or work on some of the over 6 million other articles we have. 331dot (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I tell you what. All of you, including bondea and theroadislong, are absolutely clueless. TooLebby (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Personal attacks are not likely to help you. 331dot (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

That is not a personal attack. Do not accuse me of that.

Thanks. TooLebby (talk) 21:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Saying that two users and "all" are "clueless" is a personal attack on editors who have much more experience and knowledge than you do about creating articles. You would be wise to heed what you have been told. 331dot (talk) 22:29, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I have every right to make that statement. Why? It is simple. They, and you, seem to contradict themselves. Do not take it personally. Like I said, it is not a personal attack. It is not directed at you. Please stop thinking you are better than everyone and that you know more than everyone because you have spent a longer time on the website. My comments are not being heard. You and others are ignoring the comments and replying with petty ones. TooLebby (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't think I'm "better" than you. I and others have more experience than you. There's a difference. It's not a matter of time, but actions. And I'm not sure how I should not take being told I'm "clueless" personally. Anyway, I will excuse myself from this page. 331dot (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop responding on two different pages. Stick to one. Thanks TooLebby (talk) 23:00, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. bonadea contributions talk 14:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Don’t try and stop me from debating about your decision. I am not attacking anyone. If you try to stop me from debating my point then I will take this further as you’re attempting to stop freedom of speech. TooLebby (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

You have no freedom of speech here, see WP:FREESPEECH. --Yamla (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes I do. That’s another thing I can add to the abuse I have been receiving on here. And again another administrator abusing their power. TooLebby (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I am taking this to the authorities. Prepare to get taken to court. TooLebby (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Taking away freedom of speech is disgusting. TooLebby (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Because of the legal threat, I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)