User talk:ToothpasteSausage

June 2019[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Death and state funeral of George H. W. Bush and Ralph D. Winter. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 06:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~ ToothpasteSausage (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ToothpasteSausage (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I actually am here to help build the encyclopedia ToothpasteSausage (talk) 21:52, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In that case, WP:CIR applies. Yamla (talk) 21:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ToothpasteSausage (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Let's be reasonable. An indefinite block is excessive. How about a one week block, with time served credited. Would it help id you knew that I am white? ToothpasteSausage (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, to all of the above except "let's be reasonable". Huon (talk) 00:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to decline the open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 23:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]